Slavic &
  East
  European
  Section
      Section Information
What Is SEES
SEES Committees
SEES Officers
Annual Newsletter

      Conference Information
SEES Programs
Conference Minutes
Conference Schedule

      Other Information
Internet Links
Slavic Cataloging FAQ

Executive Committee Minutes
January 10, 2004

Present: Terri Miller (Michigan State), Gordon Anderson (Minnesota), Tatiana G. Barr (Florida), Jackie Byrd (Indiana), Beth Feinberg (UCLA), Inna Gudanets (Stanford), Jared Ingersoll (Columbia), Charles Kratz (Scranton--ACRL Vice President/President-Elect Candidate), Pat Kreitz (Stanford--ACRL Liaison), Soobum Kim (Stanford), Sandra Levy (Chicago), Tatiana Lorkovic (Yale), Miranda Remnek (Illinois), Dan Pennell (Pittsburgh), Janice Pilch (Illinois), Brad Schaffner (Kansas), Marek Sroka (Illinois), Cathy Zeljak (George Washington)

Committee Reports:

  • Automated Bibliographic Control Committee: Inna Gudanets, Chair,reported on the following ABC topics:
    • The Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian language question and the related correspondence with the Library of Congress. It has been decided that ABC will not pursue this issue any further.
    • New ABC web manager, Soobum Kim, and the content of the ABC website
    • Changes for the Slavic Cataloging Manual regarding the switch from "Yugoslavia" to "Serbia and Montenegro"
    • Vernacular cataloging and the related 2004 SEES program for the upcoming Orlando conference

  • Continuing Education Committee: Terri Miller reported on the following topics for the committee:
    • The future of the committee
    • The committee's work in the recent past
    • The committee as part of the agenda topic on the Future of SEES

  • Program Planning Committee: Terri Miller reported on the following topics for the 2004 committee:
    • Publicity due January 16th, 2004
    • Topic is "Library Catalogs and Non-Roman Scripts: Development and Implementation of UNICODE for Cataloging and Public Access"
    • Projected audience is 350
    • Collaboration as a way to increase attendance by broadening focus

    Janice Pilch reported for the 2005 committee:

    • Topic is "European Union and Libraries"
    • Program is co-sponsored with WESS (West European Studies Section) and LPSS (Law and Political Science Section), both ACRL sections
    • This is just preliminary planning, since it hasn't yet been decided whether SEES will have a program at the 2005 Annual Conference yet

  • Newsletter Committee: Terri Miller reported on the following topics for the committee:
    • Deadline for submissions is the end of January
    • Newsletter is well funded
    • ACRL is strongly committed to continued support for the Newsletter, even if SEES should merge with another section

  • Electronic Resources & Preservation Committees: Cathy Zeljak and Brad Schaffner reported on the following topics for the 2 committees:
    • Should the two committees be merged into one or become part of a discussion group within the section? It was decided that the committees would merge and become a single standing committee. Cathy and Brad will draft a charge for the new committee and suggest a name. Tentatively, the name will be "Access and Preservation Committee".
    • Review of SEES website resulted in the following suggestions:
      • Link to the AAASS B&D Working Group on Digital Projects
      • Link to digitized newsletters, when available
      • Link to list of faculty collections available
    • Feedback to JSTOR on Slavic titles to digitize: Brad, as committee member/chair and member of B&D Working Group will coordinate this
    • Program in Orlando on Khrushchev Archives, postponed from Toronto conference
    • SlavCopy & Brittle now part of OCLC

Announcements on Appointments and Reappointments for 2004:

  • Janice Pilch distributed a list of committee rosters for SEES committees. She reported that committee chairs need to consult with those going off of committees in 2004 to get the members reappointed to the committee and need to seek new appointments. Paper forms, which she also distributed, should be mailed to Janice's home address (on the committee roster sheet) by March 1st, 2004. Electronic forms may be requested from Janet via email and are due on the same date. The top section of the formshould be left blank. Janice reported that the ACRL has committee rosters posted on its website under "Directory of Leadership", a site that requires users to login.
  • The ACRL website has a roster for SEES's Membership Committee. It's a bad link that includes names not related to SEES.

Announcement on Slavic Librarians' Workshop: Miranda Remnek reported on the upcoming Slavic Librarians Workshop at the University of Illinois. It will be a 4-day workshop held July 6-9, 2004 and will be divided into 3 sections. Those attending can choose which sections to attend, or they may attend all 3. The sections are:

  • June 6: Traditional Slavic Librarians' Workshop
  • June 7: An introductory text encoding workshop
  • June 8-9: An advanced hands-on text encoding workshop--there may be a small charge for this part
    Miranda is looking at having a traditional workshop and a workshop on a specialized topic in alternating years.

ACRL Liaison Report:
  • ACRL liaison Pat Kreitz introduced Charles Kratz, an ACRL Vice-President/President-Elect candidate, who had been meeting with sections throughout the conference. Charles asked SEES members for issues important to them. The issues included:
    • The cost of attending 2 national conferences per year
    • The importance of virtual membership to help with the cost of conferences
    • Attracting new members for SEES
    • Question of whether the cost of ALA membership and conference attendance is a value, especially with the option of AAASS, which has a single conference and less costly membership dues
  • Pat Kreitz reported on some ACRL issues and developments, including:
    • The ACRL Board meeting on Sunday begins with an open microphone, and it's a good way to voice concerns about ALA costs
    • Virtual Meeting Task Force is looking at how ACRL can support virtual meetings because ACRL has heard from many Sections about the cost of attending two meetings a year, particularly in years when there is an ACRL National conference or when a subject-specialized Section also has a scholarly meeting to attend. Many Sections are interested in making conference attendance at Midwinter not mandatory. ACRL recognizes this is a financial burden for members.
    • SEES has good representation in ACRL Leadership and Section Councils meetings
    • The ACRL Strategic Plan was distributed and SEES members were asked to read it over and provide input. The plan will be finalized by the time of the Orlando conference. ACRL members will then be asked to help with action items. Terri reported that she was impressed with the plan, in particular with the goals of agility and flexibility, the incentives for leadership, and the fostering of collaboration, even with outside groups.

Discussion on the Future of SEES: Reorganization Strategies: Terri Miller led a discussion on the future of SEES. It became clear that this issue required action when it was difficult to find a SEES member who was willing to run for the Vice-Chair/Chair-Elect position in the upcoming elections. Terri distributed documents outlining 2 proposals that she drafted:

  • Combine SEES with WESS into a Larger ESS (European Studies Section) Group: This proposal addressed the size of SEES and the problems of maintaining such a small section. It would allow Slavic issues to be discussed as part of the larger section, but would eliminate the need to support a section primarily made up of inactive members. The proposal included the following:
    • SEES and WESS would both be dissolved and officers for the ESS would be elected from the combined memberships of SEES and WESS
    • Committees vital to SEES would be formed under ESS
    • The SEES and WESS newsletters would be combined into one, as would the websites. Although this was in Terri's original proposal, discussions at the conference led to the understanding that ACRL would support the continuation of the SEES Newsletter, even if SEES merged with another section.
    • There would be 2 members-at large
  • Reorganization of SEES: This proposal addresses the small number of active members and the difficulty in finding a member to run for section offices. It focuses on downsizing and reduction of administrative paperwork. The proposal included the following:
    • Elimination of the Member-at-large position, which currently serves no function
    • Removal of the unstated requirement that the Chair organize an annual program. Instead, the Chair could appoint a Program Planning Committee if interest warrants having a program. Program planning would be a regular agenda item at all ALA conferences to allow members to suggest program topics, voice a willingness to organize a program, and/or enable SEES to collaborate with other groups. This would ensure that programs are held as needed and as interest warrants.
    • Creation of a discussion group within SEES, the "Slavic Collections Discussion Group." The convener of the group, appointed by the discussion group members, would organize informal meetings on topics of interest. This would require SEES to add a section on discussion groups in its bylaws.
    • Retention of the Automated Bibliographic Control (ABC) Committee, but changing its name to something that clearly defines it as a Slavic/East European/Central Asian cataloging committee.
    • Retention of the Newsletter Committee as is.
    Gordon Anderson spoke from a WESS perspective, reporting that WESS would expect any request to merge to come from SEES. Gordon asked whether SEES members interested in the Baltic area would be interested in joining a discussion group on Baltic Studies in WESS. Discussions throughout the day at committee meetings made it clear that SEES members did not want to merge with another section at this time, so a general discussion followed, raising the following issues and alternatives:
    • Could SEES affiliate itself with AAASS and meet at that conference instead of at ALA?
    • Could SEES meet only once a year at only the ALA Annual Conference or at only the ALA Mid-Winter Conference?
    • The problem with merging with WESS or a Baltic Studies Section is that much of SEES's work covers areas in Asia
    • SEES members may be more willing to run for chair if the requirement of organizing a program is removed
    • SEES can streamline, but we still need people willing to be officers and active members
    After the discussion, a motion was made and seconded. The motion included the following points:
    • The Continuing Education Committee would be eliminated
    • The Electronic Resources and Preservation Committees would be merged into a single standing committee
    • The remaining standing committees will be retained
    • An annual program becomes optional and is removed as a responsibility of the chair
    • The Member-at-Large position will be eliminated
    • At this time, SEES will not organize a discussion group, but this can be reconsidered should the need arise
    • The total meeting time for all SEES committees will not exceed a total of 4 hours for any single conference. The preferred meeting time is Saturday afternoon, although this cannot be guaranteed.
    • The above changes will be made, and they will be assessed and evaluated after a period of 2 years
    A vote of the Executive Committee approved the motion unanimously.

    Submitted by Jackie Byrd

    Last updated 5/17/04