Presenting the latest development in the field of health communication around the world

UPFRONT

Volume 8, Number 2
March-April 2003


Vol. 8, Num. 2: Contents | Editorial | Up Front | Abstracts


From This Issue | Prescriptions


Vital Data

From This Issue

With many states launching multi-million dollar tobacco counter-advertising campaigns, it is prudent that we seek answers to the basic research questions that will inform us whether tobacco counter-advertisements are effective over time, which ones work best, and what the limiting parameters are that govern their effectiveness. Further, anti-smoking
communications have the potential to backfire and strengthen initial pro-smoking attitudes, especially among young smokers. In the first article of this issue, the tobacco counter-advertising literature is reviewed as it relates to basic process questions concerning what makes counter-advertisements effective. Limitations in addressing (a) counter-advertisement content and the psychological mediators targeted, (b) counter-advertisement style and the affective reactions targeted, (c) prior smoking experience, and (d) other audience factors are enumerated. A theoretical model based on alcohol advertising research is presented to address these limitations. By applying a model that
examines the independent influence of each of these enumerated factors, as well as how their effects qualify each other, one can examine the more practical research question of when tobacco counter-advertising will work (e.g., do certain contents or styles of tobacco counter-advertisements work better for individuals of differing smoking experience or for
different audiences?). By also applying a model that addresses the how question, identifying the mediating processes that underlie qualified findings, tobacco counter-advertisers can be better informed on how to more effectively design counter-advertisements to influence more of their intended audience more of the time. Agostinelli, G., and Grube, J.W. Tobacco Counter-Advertising: A Review of the Literature and a Conceptual Model for Understanding Effects (p. 107).

Successful anti-marijuana messages can be hypothesized to have two types of effects, namely persuasion effects, that is, a change in people’s beliefs about using marijuana, and priming effects, that is, a strengthened correlation between beliefs and associated variables such as attitude and intention. The second article in this issue examines different
sets of anti-drug advertisements for persuasion and priming effects. The ads targeted the belief that marijuana is a gateway to stronger drugs, a belief that is often endorsed by campaign planning officials and health educators. A sample of 418 middle and high school students was randomly assigned to a control video or one of three series of ads,
two of which included the gateway message in either an explicit or implicit way. Results did not support the use of the gateway belief in anti-marijuana interventions. Whereas no clear persuasion or priming effects were found for any of the ad sequences, there is some possibility that an explicit gateway argument may actually boomerang. In comparison to the control condition, adolescents in the explicit gateway condition tended to agree less with the gateway message and displayed weaker correlations between anti-marijuana beliefs and their attitude toward marijuana use. The boomerang effect was most indicative of adolescents who were likely to have used marijuana in the past. Possibly, the gateway argument was contradicted by these adolescents’ immediate experience that their marijuana use did not lead to the use of stronger drugs. Thus, using a message about negative consequences of unhealthy behavior carries the risk that it may backfire when it runs counter to people’s experience. In general, the results suggest that the gateway message should not be used in anti-drug interventions. Yzer, M.C., Cappella, J.N., Fishbein, M., Hornik, R. and Ahern, R.K. The Effectiveness of Gateway Communica-tions in Anti-Marijuana Campaigns (p. 129).

Patient noncompliance with doctors’ orders and drug instructions is a serious problem, increasingly recognized as such in the medical and public policy fields, and may result in huge physical and financial costs. The third article in this issue considers this issue of compliance with pharmaceutical drug instructions by exploring communication-based ways in which intention to comply might be improved. Specifically, this research investigates the impact of (1) providing instructions that include information about the consequences of instruction noncompliance, (2) the frame (positive or negative) of the instruction and, (3) the language (i.e., plain versus medical jargon) of the instruction, on intention to comply. The results of a lab experiment suggest that compliance intentions may be enhanced when instruction content is structured in a negative frame and is communicated in plain language. Further, results suggest communicating such that potential consequences are presented in a negative frame rather than positive frame. This research considered subject compliance intention rather than actual patient behavior. While this does qualify the present research as exploratory, significant effects on com-pliance intention suggest the value of future behavioral research, as extant research shows that intention is not only an antecedent of actual behavior, but also a strong predictor of that behavior. Therefore, by demonstrating an effect on intention, this research supports the value of future research investigating the effect of plain language and negative frames on actual patient behavior. In addition to extending this research to actual patient behavior, future research should also examine the generalizability of these findings across a variety of patient populations. Bower, A.B., and Taylor, V.A. Increasing Intention to Comply with Pharmaceutical Product Instructions (p. 145).

Beliefs and behaviors that predict college students’ alcohol use are in development as young as third grade. Because both media messages and parents are important influences, the fourth article of this issue examines how college students’ (N ¼ 300) recollections of parental reinforcement of media messages associated with their current alcohol-related beliefs and behaviors. Structural equation modeling showed that college students who recalled more positive reinforcement of media messages (‘‘positive mediation’’) from their parents were less skeptical of advertising and found alcohol advertising more desirable. They also expected more positive benefits from drinking alcohol. The more they found alcohol advertising portrayals desirable, the more likely they were to think most college students drink. The less skeptical they were, and the more they believed that college students drink, the more they expected social benefits from drinking. More positive expectancies about the social benefits of drinking alcohol predicted heavier current drinking behavior. That students’ perceptions of social norms were predicted only by desirability, and not by parental communication or by skepticism, suggests that perceptions of social reality develop in part as a result of wishful thinking instead of through purely logical evaluation processes. Prevention programs can respond by incorporating strategies that acknowledge the importance of emotion-based thinking in adolescents’ decision making. This means that college-based anti-alcohol campaigns may need to present an equally glamorous alternative to alcohol consumption while also attempting to deglamorize alcohol consumption. The results also suggest that campaigns need to target parents, because while parents can help children learn useful, prosocial messages, parents also can make adolescents more receptive to media influences that lead toward more risky beliefs and behaviors. Austin, E.W. and Chen, Y.J. The Relationship of Parental Reinforcement of Media Messages to College Students’ Alcohol-Related Behaviors (p. 157).

Dental phobia is regarded as one of the greatest obstructions to adequate dental care. It has long been established that fearful dental patients are particularly sensitive to dentists’ behavior and performance of dental care. Although the dentist-patient relationship has received considerable attention during the past two decades, little research has focused on clinical encounters between dentists and dental phobic patients. The final article of this issue studied dentists’ perceptions of how they thought, felt, and what they did during the actual consultation with fearful patients. Interview questions focused on what constitutes a patient-centered consultation and what are the characteristics of a patient-oriented dentist. Five dentists specialized in treating dental phobic patients were interviewed. One core category, ‘‘Holistic perception and understanding of the patient’’, and two main sub-categories: ‘‘The dentist’s positive outlook on people’’ and ‘‘The dentist’s positive view of patient contact’’ were identified. The latter were separated into six further sub-categories. Findings support previous models of patient-centered medicine and contribute to a better understanding of how patient-centered dentists interact with dental phobic patients. Kulich, K.R., Berggren, U., Hallberg, L.R.-M. A Qualitative Analysis of Patient-Centered Dentistry in Consultations with Dental Phobic Patients (p. 171).

Prescriptions

Agostinelli and Grube review the tobacco counter-advertising literature and present a conceptual model for understanding counter-advertising effects. They recommend the following for public health campaign planners and researchers:

  • To determine whether or not tobacco counter-advertising itself is effective, experimental research must isolate the effects of exposure to tobacco counter-advertising in a more controlled manner than is typically done in evaluation studies that examine the effectiveness of multi-component anti-tobacco campaigns.

  • A firmer understanding of the processes that underlie effective tobacco counter-advertising would benefit from applying a model that incorporates both affective and cognitive mediators of counter-advertising effects.

  • Identification through content analysis of the assumed psychological mechanisms that tobacco counter-advertisements target is needed, with recognition that a single counter-advertisement may target multiple mechanisms.

  • Identification of counter-advertising styles and the assumed affective reactions they target is needed, along with examining how those affective reactions can further affect the cognitive processing of the counter-advertisements (i.e., attention effects).

  • Documenting how individual differences in smoking experience can selectively bias the processing of varying counter-advertisements is needed, with the goal of identifying those counter-advertising contents and styles that short-circuit defensive reactions in smokers, yet maintain anti-smoking attitudes in non-smokers.

  • Exploration of other audience factors (i.e., media dependency) that may qualify exposure effects, because of differential attention to information in the media, is also needed.

—G. Agostinelli, J. W. Grube

Yzer, Cappella, Fishbein, Hornik, and Ahern studied the effectiveness of the message that marijuana use is a gateway to the use of stronger drugs. The results suggested the following recommendations for health campaigns and research:

  • The gateway message should not be used in anti-drug interventions because of its
    potential boomerang effects on adolescents.

  • Health communication research should compare the effectiveness of intervention strategies that address a single health belief versus a set of multiple related health beliefs.

  • An intervention can affect health behavior not only by changing health beliefs, but also by increasing the importance of positive health beliefs in guiding people’s perceptions and behavior.

  • Since messages about negative consequences of unhealthy behavior may backfire when they run counter to people’s experience, health interventions should address positive consequences of healthy behavior.

—M. C. Yzer, J. N. Cappella, M. Fishbein, R. Hornik, and R. K. Ahern

Bower and Taylor studied the issue of compliance with pharmaceutical drug instructions by exploring communication-based ways in which intention to comply might be improved. From their research they offer the following recommendations:

  • Results suggest that compliance intentions may be enhanced when instruction content is structured in a negative rather than positive frame.

  • Results suggest that compliance intentions may be enhanced when instruction content is communicated in plain language rather than medical terminology.

  • Results suggest the value of future research that extends these findings to actual patient behavior.

  • Future research should also examine the generalizability of these findings across a variety of patient populations.

—A. B. Bower, V. A. Taylor

Austin and Chen examined how college students’ recollections of parental reinforcement of media messages associated with their current alcohol-related beliefs and behaviors. They conclude that prevention programs should consider the following:

  • Campaign designers should consider that college students arrive on campus with well-developed beliefs and decision-making patterns, for which parents are an important influence.

  • Parents need to become more aware that their endorsement of media messages can lead adolescents to interpret media messages less skeptically, which makes adolescents more receptive to pro-drinking messages.

  • Campaigns also should consider that decisions about drinking are not entirely logical and can be influenced by wishful thinking, which advertising messages encourage.

  • To compete with commercial messages, campaigns may need to present an equally glamorous alternative to alcohol consumption while also attempting to deglamorize alcohol portrayals in the media.

—E. W. Austin, Y. J. Chen

Kulich, Berggren and Hallberg studied the dentist-patient interaction in a specializedclinic for the treatment of dental phobic patients. From their research the following conclusions can be drawn:

  • Semi-structured interviews with dentists and video-recorded dentist-patient consultations are useful tools to generate rich qualitative data. The theoretical models generated from the data contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics and
    interpersonal processes involved in the dentist-patient interaction.

  • Future qualitative research should generate theoretical models from the dental phobic patient’s perspective. It should be explored whether the dentist’s and patient’s perspective reveal concordance or difference regarding the view on the characteristics of patient-centered dentistry.

  • A systematic theory of the dentist-patient communication requires research in different dental clinic settings and in various dental patient populations.

—K. R. Kulich, U. Berggren, and L.R-M. Hallberg

__________

The Up Front section is edited by Wendy Meltzer, Managing Editor, Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives.

2/01/04
© 2003 Taylor and Francis Group
Designed by Donaghy's Web Consulting
Last Updated: 1/22/07