Financial
Market Highlights
June 2003
- The Federal Reserve retains a very accommodative monetary policy and indicate concern with deflation.
- The futures’ market projects the central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee will reduce short-term interest rates by at least one-quarter of one percent prior to the fall.
- The yield curve spread and inflation spread decline, and the low-grade corporate bond spread increases as market traders project tepid growth for the next six months.
- Congress and the administration approve a US$350 billion “jobs and growth” tax
legislation that mostly provides lower income taxes for the consumer.
- The Index of Leading Indicators increases a little in April after declining for two months; the increase suggests the U.S. will remain mired in the recovery phase for another six months.
- U.S. dollar continues to fall against the euro and yen; the lower value will stimulate exports and reduce the threat of deflation.
- Inflation indices fall in April but commodity prices increase in May and show deflation fears not yet founded.
- Industrial production continues to fall as the manufacturing sector contracts further; capacity utilization rates plummet.
- Stock prices edge up as investors are heartened by stimulative monetary and fiscal policies, and note improved corporate earnings.
- Consumer confidence remains low but improves as war in Iraq ends and oil prices fall.
- Another 48,000 Americans lose jobs as unemployment rate increases .2% to the 6.0% threshold.
- Mortgage rates fall by a sufficient amount in May to trigger another wave of refinancing activity and encourage home purchases of new and existing properties.
- Commercial and industrial construction remain low as rental rates fall and vacancy rates increase; public construction begins to feel effect of mounting state and local fiscal deficits.
The George Washington University’s School of Business and Public Management publishes Financial Market Trends as a service to students, alumni and friends of the University. We have obtained the information contained in this publication from sources believed reliable. However, we do not make any representation as to the completeness and accuracy of the data or the inferences provided. The publication is
prepared by Dr. William C. Handorf, Professor of Finance.
Financial
Market Trends
June 2003
Fed Signals Concern Over
Deflation
Interest Rates Plunge
The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) left short-term interest rates unchanged at their May policy meeting. However, the FOMC indicated, “The probability of an unwelcome substantial fall in inflation, though minor, exceeds that of a pickup in inflation from its already low level.” The market perceives that the central bank will either keep the trading range of federal funds at the historic low level of 1.25 percent for the foreseeable future or cut interest rates by as much as another one-half of one percent at the FOMC meetings scheduled late-June, mid-August or mid-September. The financial futures’ market projects a one-quarter percent reduction by the August 12 meeting. Gross domestic product increased by an anemic annualized rate of 1.6 percent in the first quarter of 2003 after posting a dismal increase of just 1.4 percent in the final quarter of 2002. The long-awaited expansion phase of the business cycle has yet to materialize. The accommodative monetary policy, new fiscal initiatives just passed by Congress, and another round of refinancing activity, in addition to a much lower U.S. dollar, should be sufficient to provide impetus for achieving sustainable economic growth late in 2003.
Table 1
Monthly Interest Rate Trends
Money Market
(Three Month) |
May 2003
|
April 2003
|
| |
Rate
|
Spread
|
Rate
|
Spread
|
| US Treasury
Bill |
1.07%
|
0.00%
|
1.14%
|
0.00%
|
| Commercial
Paper |
1.16%
|
0.09%
|
1.22%
|
0.08%
|
| Certificate
of Deposit |
1.20%
|
0.13%
|
1.26%
|
0.12%
|
Capital
Market
(20 to 30
Years) |
|
|
|
|
| US Treasury
Bond |
4.01%
|
0.00%
|
4.62%
|
0.00%
|
| Corporate Bond |
|
|
|
|
|
High-grade (Aa) |
4.97%
|
0.96%
|
5.68%
|
1.06%
|
|
Medium-grade (Baa) |
5.61%
|
1.60%
|
6.22%
|
1.60%
|
|
Low-grade (B) |
9.29%
|
5.28%
|
9.63%
|
5.01%
|
| Mortgage-backed |
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA (Fannie Mae) |
4.27%
|
0.26%
|
4.95%
|
0.33%
|
Source:
The
Wall Street Journal and Merrill Lynch Indices.
The financial markets reacted swiftly and decisively to the central bank’s unusual pronouncement during May trading. Table 1 illustrates the monthly trend in interest rates of key short-term money market and long-term capital market instruments. Interest rates respond to shifts in the global supply of and demand for funds, and to perceptions of inflation or deflation. Both short-term and long-term interest rates declined in May given the weak recovery and declining prices reported across a variety of products. Table 1 also illustrates the monthly shift in interest rate spreads; a spread reflects the difference in yield between a corporate or agency security and a U.S. Treasury instrument of comparable maturity. Interest rate spreads change in response to perceptions of risk and tolerance for risk by investors and traders. Credit spreads for money market instruments changed little and remain well below historical levels as firms have little reason to borrow money by issuing commercial paper or taking out a loan from a bank. Capital market interest rate spreads behaved with divergent trends. High-grade corporate bond yields decreased, medium-grade bond yields were unchanged and low-grade bond yields increased. Investors remain wary of risk given the uneven recovery and expectations of very slow global growth. The U.S. must overcome significant weakness in many sectors of the economy to achieve sustainable growth rates exceeding three percent per year.
Table 2
Monthly Interest Rate Spread Trends
| Spread |
May 2003 |
April 2002 |
| Yield Curve |
2.25% |
2.76% |
| Medium-Grade
Corporate |
0.64% |
0.54% |
| Low-Grade Corporate |
4.32% |
3.95% |
| Inflation |
1.68% |
1.74% |
Source: The
Wall Street Journal and Merrill Lynch Indices
Several interest rate spread relationships, to include the yield curve spread, corporate bond credit spreads, and the U.S. Treasury Note/Treasury Inflation-protected Security spread provide information that may be used to project future economic conditions, and to confirm recently-released information about trends within the U.S. economy. Although individual financial gauges may provide false indications of strength or weakness, the composite spreads provide a reasonable representation of market expectations. Table 2 illustrates the monthly trend for each of the key interest rate spreads.
- Yield Curve Spread -- The yield curve provides a graphical relationship between the projected yield and the remaining term of a U.S. Treasury security. The yield curve spread is the difference in yield between ten-year U.S. Treasury notes and three-month U.S. Treasury bills. The slope of the yield curve partly reflects expectations of interest rates in the future. A less positive slope suggests the market expects interest rates to increase by a lesser amount in the future. Lower interest rates are consistent with projections of weak growth or little inflation. The yield curve spread declined by a sizable fifty basis points in May. Ten-year U.S. Treasury note yields plunged by 58 basis points while three-month U.S. Treasury bill yields fell by seven basis points. Although the current yield curve slope of 225 basis points exceeds the 180 basis point average applicable to the past 20 years, it has declined by over 75 basis points this year alone. Interest rates remain very low as of May 2003; the market is increasingly skeptical that interest rates will rise as much or as soon as projected earlier in the year.
- Corporate Credit Spread – The corporate credit spread reflects the difference in yield between corporate securities of comparable maturity but different asset quality. The low-grade corporate bond spread provides an especially good gauge of the market’s perception of and tolerance for credit risk in the market. The yield spread between low-grade (e.g., BB, B and CCC credit ratings) and high-grade (e.g., AAA and AA ratings) corporate debt increased from 395 basis points at the end of April to 432 basis points at the end of the May. Low-grade bond yields had declined by almost 250 basis points earlier this year and again trade at single-digit rates of interest. Meanwhile, the spread between medium-grade (e.g., A and BBB ratings) and high-grade corporate bonds also increased from 54 to 64 basis points. The corporate bond spread increases when traders believe the economy will remain anemic, contract or grow at rates well below sustainable growth. The credit spread also increases when investors begin to seek safer investments, rather than higher yielding alternatives. The increasing low-grade and medium-grade credit spreads convey information comparable to the less positive yield curve; The U.S. economy will not achieve strong growth as quickly as projected earlier in the
year.
- Inflation Spread – The popular price indices illustrate historical price trends. The financial markets can be interpreted to identify future inflation expectations by focusing on the difference in yield between the nominal yield for 10-year U.S. Treasury notes, which were used to derive the U.S. Treasury yield curve spread, and the real or inflation-adjusted rate for 10-year Treasury Inflation-protected securities. The inflation spread decreased by another 6 basis points in May trading as the popular price indices all showed lower prices. The inflation spread has decreased by about 20 basis points in the last two months as early inflation projections had included pessimistic forecasts of oil market problems related to the war in Iraq. The U.S. dollar continues to lose value relative to key currencies in the global market. The U.S. dollar declined by almost six percent against the European Union’s euro and lost about two percent against both the British pound sterling and the Japanese yen in May trading. As a result of the shift in the relative value of key global currencies, U.S. exporters can charge more for their goods but the cost of imports can also increase. The price of imports actually declined by 2.7 percent in April as the cost of petroleum products tumbled by over 16 percent. Given low and declining capacity utilization in U.S. factories, mines and utilities, coupled with rising unemployment and massive job losses, inflation is unlikely to increase by a sufficient amount to trigger a restrictive monetary response by the central bank.
The Federal Reserve’s FOMC provided no signal of monetary policy at their late-March meeting. The federal funds future’s market suggests that the key policy group is unlikely to change short-term lower interest rates in their May, July or August meetings. The futures’ market suggests a rate cut is more likely than an increase. Even without any additional easing, monetary policy is accommodative. The real or inflation-adjusted rate of interest for federal funds has been negative since November 2002. The rate of inflation exceeds the trading range of federal funds set by the
FOMC.
Inflation Indices Decline
The popular price indices all declined in April after spiking by war-related
factors in March.
- The Producer Price Index fell by a very large
1.9% in April compared to a large increase of 1.5% in March. The core rate
of inflation, which excludes volatile oil and food costs, decreased by .9%
in April after increasing by .7% the prior month. Wholesale costs have
increased by 2.4% during the past year.
- The Consumer Price Index fell by .3% in April
while the core rate of inflation was unchanged. Consumer prices have risen
by 2.2% in the last year; core costs have increased by just 1.5%.
- The price component of the Institute for
Supply Management’s monthly surveys applicable to both the manufacturing
and the non-manufacturing sectors were surprisingly high in April; both
surveys suggested purchasing managers reported higher cost goods and
services.
Table 3
Monthly Commodity Cost Trends
(May 2003)
| Commodity |
Monthly
Percentage
Price Change
|
| Gold |
10.0%
|
| Oil |
8.3%
|
| Wheat |
1.9%
|
| All-Commodity
Index |
5.2%
|
Source:
The
Wall Street Journal and DI-AIG Commodity Index
The commodity markets provide another source of information regarding price pressure faced by business and consumers. Although companies can and do offset the cost of rapidly rising goods purchased by operating more efficiently and/or by accepting lower gross profit margins, the cost trend applicable to commodities should not be ignored. Table 3 illustrates the monthly trend in the cost of key goods traded in the commodity market. Gold prices, which provide a harbinger of inflation, increased by 10 percent in May. Gold prices also respond to continued global terrorism, the mounting U.S. fiscal deficit, and expectation of modestly higher prices. After falling in April, oil prices increased by over eight percent in May trading. High oil prices cause severe operating problems for industries dependent upon petroleum, such as airlines and trucks. The all-commodity futures’ index increased by over five percent in the past month. The higher cost commodity costs are consistent with the high cost component applicable to surveys conducted by the Institute for Supply Management. Prices are behaving well; neither deflation nor inflation should inhibit economic expansion in the United States during 2003. Governmental policy remains
stimulative.
Fiscal Tax Legislation Enacted
Although the U.S. government posted a surplus of US$51 billion in April, the fiscal deficit posted through the first seven months of the year amounts to US$202 billion versus US$65 billion red ink a year ago. Governmental outlays have increased by 6.5 percent in the past year as defense-related spending mounts. Tax receipts have declined by 5.4 percent in the year. The U.S. federal government is on track for posting a deficit well in excess of US$300 billion in the current fiscal year. Congress and President reached compromise and approved a tax relief and jobs bill that is projected to cost US$350 billion over the next ten years. Key provisions and projected costs include (percentage of projected costs shown parenthetically):
- Cut the marginal tax rate applicable to both dividends and capital gains to 15%: (42%)
- Accelerate to this year and next lower marginal tax rates currently projected for 2004 through 2006: (32%)
- Increase the standard deduction and expand the 15% tax bracket for married couples: (10%)
- Raise the child credit from $600 to $1,000: (9%)
- Provide more generous expensing of investments for small business and more liberal depreciation for large business: (3%)
- Other factors related to alternative minimum tax and expansion of the 10% bracket: (4%)
It is instructive to note that only US$10 billion or three percent of the $350 billion tax program directly encourages investment in equipment and technology by business. Economic stimulus will only occur if American taxpayers quickly spend or invest projected tax savings. The tax package also provides limited fiscal support for financially-strapped states. Deficit-reduction will soon top political agendas.
Not only did the Federal Reserve cut interest rates 11 times in 2001 and once in 2002 to stimulate growth, the central bank has increased the supply of funds. During April, the increase in the money supply represented one of three key components that led to a minuscule increase in the Index of Leading Indicators. The narrow money supply, M1, and the broad money supply, M2, both ballooned by about two percent in May. Further, free reserves in the banking system increased another US$100 million to $1.5 billion. The central bank clearly has indicated it will cut short-term interest rates again or begin to buy longer term U.S. Treasury debt to reduce capital market interest rates if needed. Although European countries are struggling to regain economic momentum, China is trying to contains SARS, and Japan is attempting to offset debilitating deflation, the U.S. should be able to achieve sustainable growth given the stimulative fiscal policy, a very accommodative monetary policy, another wave of mortgage refinancing and a depressed value of the U.S. dollar that should trigger more export activity. The U.S. economy needs a jump-start.
Weak Growth Projected
Index of Leading Indicators Barely Turns Positive
The Index of Leading Indicators increased by .1 of one percent in April after declining the prior two months. A shorter workweek, higher unemployment gains and fewer firms reporting slow deliveries all held the Index down. Improved consumer expectations, increasing stock prices and rapid money supply growth turned the Index positive. Regardless of individual components, the Index suggests the tepid recovery will limp for at least another six months. The Institute for Supply Management’s monthly survey for the manufacturing sector declined from a weak reading of 46.2 in March to 45.4 in April. A reading below “50” suggests no growth. The purchasing managers reported weakness in production, employment opportunities and inventories.
The manufacturing sector is unable to generate sustained vigor.
- Factory orders increased by 2.2% in April; defense orders surged by 14.2%.
- Industrial production fell by another .5% in April after declining in March; the manufacturing sector contracted by .6% while both mining and utilities reported enhanced operations.
- Capacity utilization at the nation’s factories, mines and utilities fell to 74.4% in April compared to the 20-year average use of 81.3%.
Clearly, the industrial sector is struggling to reverse course and regain momentum.
The recently enacted tax legislation provides few new incentives other than the ability for small firms to expense US$100,000 of equipment in a year versus the prior limit of $25,000, and the ability for all firms to temporarily expense 50 percent of a depreciable asset rather than the 30 percent previously used. The change in depreciation will increase the rate of return on an investment by about three percent. Selected firms are benefiting from substantial increases in defense and homeland security spending by the federal government.
The equity markets reacted positively to the end of war-uncertainty, the expectation the central bank will retain an accommodative monetary policy and the major tax cut. Table 4 illustrates the monthly trend for key indicators of the broad-based Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. The Index gained about five percent during May, which is equal to the gain posted for the year-to-date. The Index remains 14 percent lower than year-earlier levels. The material monthly gain can be traced to both improved confidence demonstrated by investors who increased the price-earnings (PE) multiple assigned future earnings from 15.9 times in April to 16.3 times in May, and increased corporate earnings. PE ratios reflect earnings growth projections by investors and demonstrate the willingness of investors to accept risk in the market. Although dividend yields fell by five basis points in May trading to 1.76 percent, the cash returns on stock exceed U.S. Treasury bill yields by almost 70 basis points. Business Week reported that earnings of an all-industry index increased by over 30 percent from year-earlier levels. Auto, oil & gas, diversified telecommunication, and industrial conglomerates all reported significant gains in net income. The equity market gains have yet to translate to job growth and new employment opportunities.
Table 4
Monthly Equity Market Trends
Standard & Poor’s 500
|
Standard & Poor’s 500
|
May 2003
|
April 2002
|
|
Index
|
923.4
|
879.0
|
|
Price-Earnings Ratio
|
|
|
|
Trailing
Year
|
29.5x
|
31.3x
|
|
Next
Year
|
16.3x
|
15.9x
|
|
Dividend Yield
|
1.76%
|
1.81%
|
Source: BusinessWeek and Standard & Poor’s Corporation
More Jobs Lost
The Conference Board reported a very large gain in consumer confidence in April; the monthly index surged from a very low reading of 61.4 in March to 81 in April as prior concerns related to the war and cost of oil dissipated. Despite the monthly gain, consumer confidence is lower today than in the recession of 2001. Indeed, only 5.9 percent of the 5,000 households polled expect to purchase a car in the next six months which is the lowest proportion since 1996. The low confidence is directly linked to the loss of jobs in the economy.
- Another 48,000 workers lost employment and the unemployment rate increased by .2% to 6.0%. Over 500,000 Americans have lost a job in the past quarter.
- Despite the devastating loss of jobs, both personal income and spending increased by .4% in March and personal saving rate hovers near 3.6%.
- Consumer debt increased by a minuscule .6% annualized rate in March compared to the 3.6% growth posted in 2002 and 6.9% in 2001.
- Retail sales fell .1% in April but that poor month merely offset a 2.3% rise reported in March. Discount stores, such as Dollar General and Costco, report strong retail sales growth, while department stores, such as Sears or J. C. Penney, report declining sales.
The consumer sector is key to the U.S. achieving sustainable growth because it accounts for about two-thirds of gross domestic product. The tax legislation will increase disposable income for workers as early as July 2003. Many homeowners will again be able to refinance mortgages given the recent drop in 10-year U.S. Treasury rates of interest that affect home loan rates. Employed Americans will have more money to spend.
The economy would have remained in a recession, rather than the tepid recovery during the past year, without the robust residential real estate market. Long-term, fixed-rate mortgage rates fell to 5.3 percent in May compared to 6.8 percent a year ago. The one-year decline can reduce monthly payments by over 14 percent and save almost $150 per month for a mortgagor with a $150,000 30-year loan.
- Although construction spending fell by 1% in March, it remains 1.5% above year-earlier levels. Residential spending increased by .1% in March, non-residential fell by just .2% and public spending plummeted by 3.5% as states grapple with fiscal deficits.
- New home sales increased by 7.3% in March to 1.012 million unit sales. Importantly, the supply of new homes fell from a low 4.4 months in February to 4.1 months in March.
- Existing-home sales declined by 5.6% in March as prospective home owners watched war news. Despite the monthly decline, home sales represent 5.53 million annualized unit sales.
The very low rate of interest for mortgage loans should provide more support for the residential market. Non-residential construction will remain weak as office vacancies exceed 16 percent and industrial vacancy rates rose to 10.1 percent in the first quarter of 2003 compared to 8.9 percent a year earlier.
Summary
The fighting in Iraq is over. Congress approved major tax relief legislation. The Federal Reserve has indicated it will retain an accommodative monetary policy. Stock prices are up five percent this year and long-term interest rates have declined to record low levels. Consumer confidence has improved but remains low. The U.S. dollar has lost over 20 percent of its value against the euro and almost 10 percent against the yen in the past year. Although the FOMC has stated concern with falling prices, gold prices, oil costs and the commodity futures’ index all increased in May trading. If the consumer sector spends tax savings, low mortgage rates encourage another wave of refinancing activity and home purchases, and the low value of the dollar props exports, the U.S. economy will enter the long-awaited expansion phase of the business cycle. Policy-makers have provided a framework to support economic growth. The financial markets do not project expansion until late in the year.
We have obtained
the information in this publication from sources believed reliable. However,
we do not make any representation as to the accuracy or completeness of
the data or the appropriateness of the inferences provided.
|