TRANSCRIPT from the White House
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
AT THE OPENING OF THE WHITE HOUSE FORUM ON
March 5, 2009
1:10 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you so much, Travis, for the wonderful
introduction. Thank you for Melody Barnes, who has done more than
anyone to help coordinate this forum and its extraordinary work.
And so we appreciate her leadership.
We're here today to discuss one of the greatest threats not just to the
well-being of our families and the prosperity of our businesses, but to
the very foundation of our economy -- and that's the exploding costs of
health care in America today.
In the last eight years, premiums have grown four times faster than
wages. An additional 9 million Americans have joined the ranks of
the uninsured. The cost of health care now causes a bankruptcy in
America every 30 seconds. By the end of the year, it could cause
1.5 million Americans to lose their homes. Even for folks who are
weathering this economic storm, and have health care right now, all it
takes is one stroke of bad luck -- an accident or an illness, a
divorce, a lost job -- to become one of the nearly 46 million uninsured
or the millions who have health care, but really can't afford what
We didn't get here by accident. The problems we face today are a
direct consequence of actions that we failed to take yesterday.
Since Teddy Roosevelt first called for reform nearly a century ago, we
have talked and we have tinkered. We have tried and fallen short,
we've stalled for time, and again we have failed to act because of
Washington politics or industry lobbying.
And today, there are those who say we should defer health care reform
once again -- that at a time of economic crisis, we simply can't afford
to fix our health care system, as well.
Well, let me be clear: The same soaring costs that are straining
families' budgets are sinking our businesses and eating up our
government's budget, too. Too many small businesses can't insure
their employees. Major American corporations are struggling to
compete with their foreign counterparts. And companies of all
sizes are shipping their jobs overseas or shutting their doors for
Medicare costs are consuming our federal budget; I don't have to tell
members of Congress this. Medicaid is overwhelming our state
budgets; I don't need to tell governors and state legislatures that.
At the fiscal summit that we held here last week, the one thing on
which everyone agreed was that the greatest threat to America's fiscal
health is not Social Security, though that's a significant challenge;
it's not the investments that we've made to rescue our economy during
this crisis. By a wide margin, the biggest threat to our nation's
balance sheet is the skyrocketing cost of health care. It's not
That's why we cannot delay this discussion any longer. That's why
today's forum is so important -- because health care reform is no
longer just a moral imperative, it's a fiscal imperative. If we
want to create jobs and rebuild our economy and get our federal budget
under control, then we have to address the crushing cost of health care
this year, in this administration. Making investments in reform
now, investments that will dramatically lower costs, won't add to our
budget deficits in the long term -- rather, it is one of the best ways
-- in fact maybe the only way -- to reduce those long-term costs.
Now, I know people are skeptical about whether Washington can bring
about this change. Our inability to reform health care in the
past is just one example of how special interests have had their way,
and the public interest has fallen by the wayside. And I know
people are afraid we'll draw the same old lines in the sand and give in
to the same entrenched interests and arrive back at the same stalemate
that we've been stuck in for decades.
But I am here today and I believe you are here today because this time
is different. This time, the call for reform is coming from the
bottom up and from all across the spectrum -- from doctors, from
nurses, from patients; from unions, from businesses; from hospitals,
health care providers, community groups. It's coming from mayors
and governors and legislatures, Democrats, Republicans -- all who are
racing ahead of Washington to pass bold health care initiatives on
their own. This time, there is no debate about whether all
Americans should have quality, affordable health care -- the only
question is, how?
And the purpose of this forum is to start answering that question -- to
determine how we lower costs for everyone, improve quality for
everyone, and expand coverage to all Americans. And our goal will
be to enact comprehensive health care reform by the end of this
year. That is our commitment. That is our goal.
Now, in the past month alone, we've done a lot more to advance that
goal than we've done in the past decade. We've provided and
protected coverage for 11 million children from working families, and
for 7 million Americans who've lost their jobs in this downturn.
We've made the largest investment in history in preventive care;
invested in electronic medical records that will save money, ensure
privacy, and save lives; we've launched a new effort to find a cure for
cancer in our time. We've also set aside in our budget a health
care reserve fund to finance comprehensive reform. I know that
more will be required, but this is a significant down payment that's
fully paid for, does not add one penny to our deficit. And I look
forward to working with Congress and the American people to get this
Now, as we work to determine the details of health care reform, we
won't always see eye to eye. We may disagree -- and disagree
strongly -- about particular measures. But we know that there are
plenty of areas of agreement, as well, and that should serve as the
starting points for our work.
We can all agree that if we want to bring down skyrocketing costs,
we'll need to modernize our system and invest in prevention. We
can agree that if we want greater accountability and responsibility, we
have to ensure that people aren't overcharged for prescription drugs,
or discriminated against for pre-existing conditions -- and we need to
eliminate fraud, waste and abuse in government programs. I think
most of us would agree that if we want to cover all Americans, we can't
make the mistake of trying to fix what isn't broken. So if
somebody has insurance they like, they should be able to keep that
insurance. If they have a doctor that they like, they should be
able to keep their doctor. They should just pay less for the care
that they receive.
And finally, we can all agree that if we want to translate these goals
into policies, we need a process that is as transparent and inclusive
as possible. And that's why I've asked all of you --
representatives of organizations, interests, and parties from across
the spectrum -- to join us here today. In fact, this was the
hottest ticket in town. (Laughter.) That's why we asked
concerned citizens like the folks on this stage to organize open
meetings across America where people could air their views. As
Travis said, more than 3,000 meetings were held in all 50 states and
D.C.; more than 30,000 people attended. I thank them for their
input and their ideas, and look forward to reading the report that
Travis has presented to me.
In this effort, every voice has to be heard. Every idea must be
considered. Every option must be on the table. There should
be no sacred cows. Each of us must accept that none of us will
get everything that we want, and that no proposal for reform will be
perfect. If that's the measure, we will never get anything
done. But when it comes to addressing our health care challenge,
we can no longer let the perfect be the enemy of the essential.
And I don't think anybody would argue that we are on a sustainable path
when it comes to health care.
Finally, I want to be very clear at the outset that while everyone has
a right to take part in this discussion, nobody has the right to take
it over and dominate. The status quo is the one option that's not
on the table, and those who seek to block any reform at all -- any
reform at any costs will not prevail this time around.
I didn't come here to Washington to work for those interests. I
came here to work for the American people -- the folks I met on the
campaign trail, the people I hear from every single day in the White
House. Folks who are working hard, making all the right
decisions, but still face choices that no one in this country should
have to make: how long to put off that doctor's appointment;
whether to fill that prescription; when to give up and head to the
emergency room because there are no other options.
I've read some of the many letters they've sent asking me for help.
And they're usually not asking for much. I don't get
letters where people are just asking for a free ride, for a
handout. Most of them are embarrassed about their situation; they
would rather not have to ask for help. They start, usually, by
saying that they've never written a letter like this before. Some
end by apologizing -- saying they've written to me because they have
nowhere else to turn; asking me not to forget about them, not to forget
about their families.
But there are a lot of people out there who are desperate.
There's a lot of desperation out there. Today I want them, and
people like them across this country, to know that I have not forgotten
them. We have not forgotten them. They are why we're here
today -- to start delivering the change they demanded at the polls in
November; that they have continued to demand since the election.
And if we're successful, if we can pass comprehensive reform, these
folks will see their costs come down, they'll get the care they need,
and we'll help our businesses create jobs again so our economy can grow.
So it's not going to be easy. And there are going to be false
starts and setbacks and mistakes along the way. But I'm confident
if we come together and work together, we will finally achieve what
generations of Americans have fought for and fulfill the promise of
health care in our time. And what a remarkable achievement that
would be -- something that Democrats and Republicans, business and
labor, consumer groups and providers, all of us could share
extraordinary pride in finally dealing with something that has been
vexing us for so long.
So let's get to work. Thank you. (Applause.)
1:21 P.M. EST
"Following the opening session,
attendees will divide into five breakout groups to discuss ideas on how
to bring down health care costs and increase coverage."
About 60 Members of Congress (23 Senators 32 Congressmen) and 82
community leaders and stakeholders participated. There were also
seven "everyday Americans." Two administration officials
moderated each group.
Community Leaders and
Stakeholders Expected to Attend
(in alphabetical order by organization name)
AARP, Bill Novelli, President
ADAPT, Bobby Coward
AFL-CIO, Gerry Shea, Assistant to the President for Governmental
AFSCME, Gerry McEntee, President
AFT, Randy Weingarten, President
AIDS Action Rebecca Haag President and CEO
Alliance for Retired Americans, Ed Coyle, Executive Director
America’s Health Insurance Plans, Karen Ignani, President and CEO
American Cancer Society, Daniel Smith, President
American College of Physicians, Jeff Harris, President
American Academy of Pediatrics, David Tayloe, President
American College of Cardiology, W. Douglas Weaver, President
American Academy of Family Physicians, Ted Epperly, President
American Diabetes Association, Larry Hausner, CEO
American Heart Association, Timothy J. Gardner,
American Hospital Association, Rich Umbdenstock, President
American Medical Association, Nancy Nielsen, President
American Nurses Association, Rebecca Patton, President
Asian and Pacific Islander Health Forum, Dr. Ho Tran, Executive
Association of Asian Pacific Community Health Organizations, Jeff
Caballero, Executive Director
Building and Construction Trades Department, Mark Ayers, President
Better Health Care Together, Jody Hoffman, Executive Director
Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Scott Serota, CEO
Campaign for America's Future, Roger Hickey, Founder and Co-Director
Campaign for Mental Health Reform, William Emmett, Director
Catholic Health Association, Sister Carol Keehan, President and CEO
CCD Health Task Force, Peter
CED, Charlie Kolb, CEO
Center for American Progress, John Podesta, President and CEO
Change to Win, Anna Burger, Chair
Children's Defense Fund, Marian Wright Edelman, Founding
Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, Irwin E. Redlener,
Communications Workers of America, Larry Cohen, President
Families USA, Ron Pollack, President
Federation of American Hospitals, Chip Kahn, President
General Mills, Ken Powell, President and CEO
Health Care for America Now, Richard Kirsch, National Campaign
Hispanic Medical Association, Elena Rios,
Human Rights Campaign, Joe Solmonese, President
Jennings Policy Strategies Group, Inc, Chris Jennings, President
League of United Latin American Citizens, Brent Wilkes, Executive
Markle Foundation, Zoe Baird, President
National Association of Counties, Valerie Brown, Incoming NACO Chair
National Association of Manufacturers, John Engler, President and CEO
National Association of People with AIDS, Frank Oldham, President and
National Association of Community Health Centers, Tom Van Coverden,
President and CEO
National Council of La Raza, Janet Murguia, President and CEO
National Jewish Hospital, Dr. Michael Salem, President
National Congress of American Indians, Jacqueline L. Johnson Pata,
National Federation of Independent Businesses, Dan Danner, President
National Indian Health Board, Stacey Bohlen, Executive Director
National Medical Association, Mohammad Akhter, Executive Director
National Partnership for Women and Families, Debra Ness,
National Business Group on Health, Helen Darling,
National Association of Children's Hospitals, Larry McAndrews,
President and CEO
National Association of Public Hospitals, Larry Gage, President
National Rural Health Association, Dennis Berens, President
National Coalition on Health Care, Henry Simmons, Founder
National Association for Home Care & Hospice, Val Halamandaris,
National Women's Law Center, Marcia Greenberger,
National Minority AIDS Council, Paul Kawata,
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Rea Carey, President
National Hispanic Health Alliance, Dr. Jane Delgado, President
National Education Association, Dennis Van Roekel, President
Pfizer, Jeffrey Kindler, CEO
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), Billy
Tauzin, President and CEO
Physicians for a National Health Plan, Dr. Oliver Fein, Director
PICO, Scott Hersey Reed, Executive Director
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Cecile Richards,
Racial and Ethnic Disparities Health Coalition, Fredette West,
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Dr. Risa Lavizzo-Mourey, President and
SEIU, Dennis Rivera, Chair
SEIU, Andy Stern, President
Small Business Majority, John Arensmeyer, Founder and CEO
Teamsters, Jim Hoffa, President
Trust for America's Health, Jeff Levi, Executive
UAW, Ronald Gettelfinger, President
UFCW, Joe Hansen, President
University of Chicago Medical School, Eric Whitaker, Executive Vice
President For Strategic Affiliations
University of Miami, Donna Shalala, President
USW, Leo Gerard, President
US Chamber, Tom Donohue, President
CLOSING REMARKS BY THE
AT HEALTH CARE FORUM
FOLLOWED BY Q&A
4:08 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: To Sir Edward Kennedy. (Applause.)
That's the kind of greeting a knight deserves. (Laughter.)
It is thrilling to see you here, Teddy. We are so grateful for
you taking the time to be here and the extraordinary work that your
committee has already started to do, along with Mike Enzi; I know Max
Baucus and Chuck Grassley on the Senate side; Henry, I know that you
guys are gearing to go on the House side.
So I just want to, first of all, thank all of you for
participating. Today was the first discussion in this effort, but
it was not the last. In the coming days and weeks we'll be
convening a series of meetings with senior administration officials
here at the White House to further explore some of the key issues that
were raised today and to bring more voices into the conversation.
But my understanding is, is that we had an extraordinarily productive
set of sessions throughout the day. And I've gotten a readout
from some of the breakout groups and breakout sessions. And I
just want to summarize a few things that my staff thought were notable
and that I thought were notable and are worth mentioning before I start
taking some questions or some comments.
First of all: A clear consensus that the need for health care
reform is here and now. Senators Hatch, Enzi, Congressman Jim
Cooper and many others agreed that we can do health care reform.
Senator Hatch said that we needed leadership on both sides, and he
believes that Democrats and Republicans need to put politics aside and
work together to do it. Senator Whitehouse said this isn't a
"Harry and Louise" moment, it's a "Thelma and Louise" moment.
(Laughter.) We're in the car headed toward the cliff and we must
Now, I just want to be clear -- if you actually saw the movie, they did
drive over the cliff. (Laughter.) So I just want to be
clear that's not our intention here. (Laughter.)
Insurers agree: Scott Serota with Blue Cross Blue Shield
Association said to consider past opposition the past, it is not the
present; the time is right for action now. The American Medical
Association said that they are here to be partners and to help.
Tom Donahue, with the Chamber of Commerce, said that in the previous
debate we knew where everyone stood; people are in different places
now, including business, and that there is a vigorous understanding
with all parties that improvements are needed. And Congressman
Joe Barton complimented the process we've begun and said that he can
agree with the principles that we've laid out. My staff thought
that was a very notable statement, they complimenting the
process. Melody, I think, slipped that one in. (Laughter.)
With respect to the cost of care, Richard Kirsch with the Health Care
for America Now said that we can't have a false dichotomy between
coverage and costs, that by covering more people we can also lower
costs at the same time, presumably because those who are not insured at
the moment are ending up using extraordinarily expensive emergency room
Senator Whitehouse -- you've got two quotes in here -- (laughter) --
Senator Whitehouse pointed out that we pay more than a trillion dollars
-- we pay more than a trillion dollars more than other countries for
the same or lower qualities of care.
Ken Powell, CEO of General Mills, and a member of the Business
Roundtable, stressed the need to preserve the role of employers, and
that many employers are investing in excellent prevention programs that
are reducing costs and improving productivity. And I can testify
to that. I've met a lot of extraordinary companies that have
really taken the bull by the horns and are doing extraordinary
work. Many participants stressed the need to invest in prevention
to lower costs and improve care, to tackle obesity, manage chronic
care, invest in comparative effectiveness.
Congressman Dingell talked about the need to simplify the system to
reduce costs and medical errors. Senator Baucus mentioned the
need to make investments up front, such as health IT and comparative
effectiveness to get big savings and that we have to align incentives
towards quality. And Congressman Waxman suggested the same point
that's been made earlier: that we can't control costs unless
everyone is covered.
With respect to the public plan, Congressman Jan Schakowsky and the
AFL-CIO talked about the need to create a public option in order to
reduce cost to consumers and save money within the system. There
were others who raised the -- some concerns about the impact of a
public plan limiting choices.
As for paying for reform, Congressman Rob Andrews challenged the group
to identify additional ways to pay for reform and suggested that
everyone needs to put something on the table to get reform done.
And Senator Wyden raised the issue of modifying the tax exclusion for
higher income Americans.
Last set of points that we thought were notable: Senators
Grassley and Hatch and Congressman Dingell all discussed the need to
address medical malpractice and reduce defensive medicine as a cost
So that's just some of the points that were made. I know that
many of you had other insights. They have all been recorded, and
we are going to be generating a document coming out of this that
summarizes much that was heard in these various breakout sessions.
But what I want to do is just take some time now to give all of you a
chance to hear from me directly, and I'm going to call on some members;
I'm going to call from some of the groups that were participating, as
well. I'm not going to be able to get to everybody.
And since he got such a weak reception when he walked in, I think that
-- (laughter) -- it's only fitting that we give Ted Kennedy the first
question. So we've got a microphone here, Ted, go ahead -- or
comment; it doesn't have to be a question.
SENATOR KENNEDY: Thank you very much, Mr. President. I join
in welcoming and seeing all of you once again at this very special
gather. I join with all of those that feel that this is the time,
now is the time, for action. I think most of us who have been in
this room before have seen other times when the House and the Senate
have made efforts, but they haven't been the kind of serious effort
that I think that we're seeing right now.
If you look over this gathering here today, you see the representatives
of all the different groups that we have met with over the period of
years. I mean, you have the insurance companies, you have the
medical professions -- all represented in one form or another.
That has not been the case over the history of the past, going all the
way back to Harry Truman's time.
But it is the case now. And it is, I think, a tribute to your
leadership in bringing all these people together and really a
leadership of so many that are gathered here today. Just in a
very brief look around, you can see representatives of so many of the
different interests. It'd be hard to think of those interests
being together and being as concerned and providing the leadership that
they are as they are demonstrating that kind of a commitment as we have
What it does is basically challenges all of us to really do the best we
can. And I know that you and all of your staff -- I congratulate
Max Baucus and my colleagues who have done such an extraordinary effort
to date. Just say that I'm looking forward to being a foot
soldier in this undertaking. And this time, we will not
THE PRESIDENT: Let me -- I want to make sure that we are getting
a good cross-section of views on this issue, so why don't I call on our
Republican Leader, Mitch McConnell, if you've got any thoughts or
comments on the issue.
SENATOR McCONNELL: First of all, Mr. President, thank you very
much for having this session today. I think it's useful and it is
significant, as Ted indicated, to have everybody in the room.
I'm also among those, as you and I have discussed before, interested in
seeing us address entitlement reform -- and admittedly, Medicare and
Medicaid would be a part of that -- but also Social Security. And
particularly concerned about having a mechanism in place that
guarantees you get a result. And I wonder where you see yourself
and the administration now, for example, in supporting something like
the Conrad-Gregg proposal, which would set in place a mechanism that
could actually guarantee that we get a result -- if not on Medicare and
Medicaid, at least on Social Security.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I appreciate the question, Mitch. As
you know, we had a fiscal responsibility summit similar to the
gathering that we've had here -- although I have to say the attendance
here is even greater -- and what I said in that forum was that I was
absolutely committed to making sure that we got entitlement reform done.
The mechanism by which we do it I think is going to have to be
determined by you, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and John Boehner and the
members of Congress. We've got to make certain that the various
committees are comfortable with how we move forward.
But the important point that I want to emphasize today is that on
Medicare and Medicaid, in particular -- which everybody here
understands is the 800-pound gorilla -- I don't see us being able to
get an effective reform package around those entitlements without
fixing the underlying problem of health care inflation. If we've
got 6, 7, 8 percent health care inflation we could fix Medicare and
Medicaid temporarily for a couple of years, but we would be back in the
same fix 10 years from now. And so our most urgent task is to
drive down costs both on the private side and on the public side,
because Medicare and Medicaid costs have actually gone up fairly
comparably to what's been happening in the private sector what
businesses and families and others have been doing. That's why I
think it's so important for us to focus on costs as part of this
overall reform package.
With respect to Social Security, I actually think it's easier than
Medicare and Medicaid, and as a consequence, I'm going to be interested
in working with you. And I know that others like Senator Durbin,
Lindsay Graham have already begun discussions about what the best
mechanisms would be. I remain committed to that task.
But if we don't tackle health care, then we're going to break the
bank. I think that's true at the federal level, I think it's true
at the state level. It's certainly true for businesses and it's
certainly true for families, okay.
Henry, do you want to just give a little feedback in terms of what you
heard, and any points you'd like to make?
REPRESENTATIVE WAXMAN: Thank you very much, Mr. President.
Let me just say that Senator Kennedy will not be a foot soldier in this
battle. He has been the inspiration to all of us, all Americans
who held out the dream that every American ought to have affordable,
quality health care. And I want to salute him for that.
Mr. President, by bringing people together -- with different
stakeholders and the people representing different interest groups and
Democrats and the Republicans, all of us together -- I think you've
given us an opportunity not to insist that we get all that we want, but
to realize that we're part of a process; and that we if don't get
everything we want, the alternative is not to do nothing, as you
pointed out earlier, but to make sure that we've got the best system we
can develop. And that has to be a system that includes all
Americans in health insurance that they'll be able to hold onto if they
think they're satisfied with it, or to be able to access if they don't
have it at the present time.
So I think this is a very useful meeting. Our breakout session
was very on point. And I think it leads all of us to recognize
that we have to work together, we all need to recognize there are going
to be tradeoffs; but if we don't get the tradeoff exactly the way we
want it, we've got to recognize there's a broader public goal and
purpose. And your leadership, I think, is going to make this bill
THE PRESIDENT: Good. Thank you. Thank you, Henry.
Is Jo Ann Emerson here? There you are. Good to see you, Jo
REPRESENTATIVE EMERSON: Thank you very much for having me here
today. And thank you very much for your passion on this
issue. Coming from a very rural, poor district in southeast and
south central Missouri, I have so many constituents who have no
insurance, nor do they have -- nor do those who have insurance
necessarily have access --
THE PRESIDENT: To providers.
REPRESENTATIVE EMERSON: -- to providers, particularly primary
providers. And so for us to be able to get together, all
stakeholders, members of the House, Senate Republicans, Democrats,
business, labor -- you name it -- I think that that's critical.
And I hope that all of us from both parties will be willing to kind of
take a fresh look and say, you know, if there are laws that we had on
the books before, that they need to be opened up if we need to change
the system. And I think all of us have to be willing to kind of
give a little, if you will.
And I thank you so very much because for me this has been a passion for
all 13 years I've been in Congress. Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: Good. Well, listen, I appreciate your point,
Jo Ann, and I want to amplify it. I think it is so important that
all of us make decisions throughout this process based on evidence and
data and what works, as opposed to what our dug-in positions may have
been in the past. Because if we can at least agree on a set of
facts, we're still going to have tough choices, but we're more likely
to make good decisions on behalf of families.
And so I want to be clear about my own position in this process.
During the campaign I put forward a plan for health care reform.
I thought it was a excellent plan, but I don't presume that it was a
perfect plan or that it was the best possible plan. It's
conceivable that there were other ideas out there that we had not
If there is a way of getting this done where we're driving down costs
and people are getting health insurance at an affordable rate and have
choice of doctor, have flexibility in terms of their plans, and we
could do that entirely through the market, I'd be happy to do it that
way. If there was a way of doing it that involved more government
regulation and involvement, I'm happy to do it that way, as well.
I just want to figure out what works. But that requires us to
actually look at the evidence and try to figure out, based on the
experience that now has been accumulated for a lot of years, you know,
how can we improve the system. And I'm absolutely confident that
there's going to be low-hanging fruit. For example, the issue of
health IT -- I don't think there's any dispute between Newt Gingrich
and Ted Kennedy that if we digitalize our health care system, we're
going save money over the long term and we're going to reduce error and
There are going to be some other areas that's not such low-hanging
fruit and there's greater dispute about what might work. But we
have to keep that open mind that you called for, Jo Ann. That's
going to be critical.
Let me go to Max Baucus and then Chuck Grassley. I want to get a
sense of the folks on the finance committee -- they're going to have
some influence on this process. (Laughter.) Just a little
bit. (Laughter.) Max.
SENATOR BAUCUS: Thank you, Mr. President. First, we've got
some real luminaries in this room -- yourself. A few hours ago,
you mentioned that President Roosevelt tried to accomplish health care
reform. He's over there right there in the corner -- (laughter) --
THE PRESIDENT: There's Teddy -- the other Teddy. (Laughter.)
SENATOR BAUCUS: And the third luminary is sitting right to my
right, right here. And I think in the spirit of all three of you,
this is a terrific opportunity.
Second, the American public wants it. That's a no-brainer.
We're at a time in American history when the American people want
health care reform, for all the reasons that you mentioned. And
it is, as you mentioned, a moral and physical imperative. There's
no doubt about that. And you've started this process I think in
very much the right way, namely, getting us all together, a tone and a
culture and a feeling of cooperation in a constructive way,
evidence-based -- what's the science, what works/doesn't work,
practically and pragmatically.
And the real key here is for us to continue that frame of mind,
continue that attitude, keep everybody at the table. This is
all-encompassing. There are tradeoffs everywhere. This is
not a short-term, tactical exercise. This is a strategic,
longer-term plan here.
There has to be a uniquely American solution. We're not
Europe. We're not Canada. We're not Japan. We're not
other countries. We're American, with public and private
participation. And there's no doubt in my mind just tapping into
the good old American can-do and entrepreneurial spirit that we are
going to find a solution. And the key here really is to keep --
for us to all stay at the table, keep an open mind, after we've seen
how this works with that and so forth.
This is really not going to be easy, it has a fairly steep learning
curve for an awful lot of people to get this done. But clearly
the attitude is here, that is, the frame of mind is here, the desire is
here to do this in a very cooperative way. And I can't thank you
enough for your quiet leadership to help make all that happen.
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Max. Chuck.
SENATOR GRASSLEY: Mr. President, thank you very much for this
From our breakout session you probably get the idea that it's pretty
easy to get done. We know it's very difficult to get done.
But without that sort of feeling starting out, nothing would get
done. And I think you served with us in the Senate long enough to
know that Max Baucus and I have a pretty good record of working out
bipartisan things -- neither one of us, or neither one of our parties
get everything that they want, but we've had a pretty good record -- I
think only two bills in eight years that haven't been bipartisan.
And so we have a process in place that has hearings coming up, it has a
process of getting roundtable discussions, getting stakeholders in,
getting authorities in. And we expect to have -- work on this in
the committee in June. It maybe will sound a little ambitious,
but if you are ambitious on a major problem like this that the country
decides needs to be done, it will never get done.
So the only thing that I would throw out for your consideration -- and
please don't respond to this now, because I'm asking you just to think
about it -- there's a lot of us that feel that the public option that
the government is an unfair competitor and that we're going to get an
awful lot of crowd out, and we have to keep what we have now strong,
and make it stronger.
THE PRESIDENT: Okay. Well, let me just -- I'm not going to
respond definitively. The thinking on the public option has been
that it gives consumers more choices, and it helps give -- keep the
private sector honest, because there's some competition out
there. That's been the thinking.
I recognize, though, the fear that if a public option is run through
Washington, and there are incentives to try to tamp down costs and --
or at least what shows up on the books, and you've got the ability in
Washington, apparently, to print money -- that private insurance plans
might end up feeling overwhelmed. So I recognize that there's
that concern. I think it's a serious one and a real one.
And we'll make sure that it gets addressed, partly because I assume it
will be very -- be very hard to come out of committee unless we're
thinking about it a little bit. And so we want to make sure that
that's something that we pay attention to.
A couple of other people I want to call on. I'm going to -- I'm
going to switch gears and get some groups in here, and then I'll come
back to a couple of other legislators.
Karen Ignagni -- there you are, good. Why don't you wait for a
mic, Karen, so that we can hear you. Karen represents America's
Health Insurance Plans.
MS. IGNAGNI: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for
inviting us to participate in this forum. I think on behalf of
our entire membership, they would want to be able to say to you this
afternoon, and everyone here, that we understand we have to earn a seat
at the table.
We've already offered a comprehensive series of proposals. We
want to work with you, we want to work with the members of Congress on
a bipartisan basis here. You have our commitment. We hear
the American people about what's not working. We've taken that
very seriously. You have our commitment to play, to contribute,
and to help pass health care reform this year.
THE PRESIDENT: Good, thank you. Karen, that's good
news. That's America's Health Insurance Plans. (Applause.)
And while I'm on it, why don't I call on Dan Danner, who's NFIB.
Is Dan still here? There he is. Dan.
MR. DANNER: Thank you, Mr. President.
THE PRESIDENT: Give us the business perspective.
MR. DANNER: I'm honored to be here representing small
business. We do think that small business has a key role in this
debate, and for them, cost is still the top issue. And we very
much look forward to finding a solution together that works for
America's job creators. So, appreciate being here, and thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: Good. One thing I want to talk about just --
this whole cost issue. I can't emphasize this enough: There
is a moral imperative to health care. I get 40,000 letters, I
guess, every day here in the White House. I don't read all 40,000
-- (laughter) -- but my staff selects 10 every single day that I read
and try to respond to as many of them as possible. It's a way of
staying in touch with the constituencies that I had a chance to meet
during the course of the campaign.
I can tell you that on average, out of the 10 at least three every
single day relate to somebody who's having a health care crisis.
Either it's a small business that's frustrated because they can't even
insure themselves, much less their employees; it's a mom who's trying
to figure out how to insure their child because they make a little bit
too much money so they don't qualify for SCHIP in their state --
heartbreaking stories. So there is a moral component to this that
we can't leave behind.
Having said that, if we don't address costs, I don't care how heartfelt
our efforts are, we will not get this done. If people think that
we can simply take everybody who's not insured and load them up in a
system where costs are out of control, it's not going to happen -- we
will run out of money. The federal government will be bankrupt;
state governments will be bankrupt.
So I hope everybody understands that -- for those of you who are
passionate about universal coverage and making sure that the moral
dimension of health care is dealt with, don't think that we can get
that done without -- (coughing) -- excuse me -- this is a health care
forum, so I thought I'd, you know -- (laughter) -- model what happens
when you don't get enough sleep. (Laughter.)
Don't think that we can -- that's right, I'm talking to you liberal
bleeding hearts out there. (Laughter.) Don't think that we
can solve this problem without tackling costs. And that may make
some in the progressive community uncomfortable, but it's got to be
dealt with. And the flip side is what I would say to those who
are obsessed with costs -- and this goes to the issue of Medicare and
Medicaid reform, as well -- I don't think it is a viable option as a
means of controlling costs simply to throw seniors off the Medicare
rolls, for example, or to prevent them from getting vital care that
they need, which means, you know, we've got to balance heart and head
as we move this process forward.
A couple other people I want to call on. How about Charlie
Rangel? He has a tax committee that's important.
REPRESENTATIVE RANGEL: People have said that, when I first came
to Washington -- George Washington, act like him.
(Laughter.) But I have to tell you, Mr. President, this is one of
the most exciting experience and opportunities. There hasn't been
a year that we haven't talked about this. And you have brought
all of these different stakeholders to read from the same page, to show
how important it is to our country. And I'm excited about
it. Our speakers made it abundantly clear that there may be a lot
of people to blame but it won't be our committee people, it won't be
those of us who have jurisdictions. There's nothing that we would
rather do than be able to say that we helped for you to fulfill not
just a campaign obligation but a moral obligation. We all are
And so, Senator Kennedy, this is a fantastic day. There hasn't
been a time we haven't hoped that we could do this. And so, we
know that there's going to be a lot of problems. But we also what
you've created is a group of missionaries to make our political job
easier so that when we have the problems they won't have to say, what
are they doing in Congress? They can go to our union leaders, our
business people, advocate for children's, those that do want public
programs. And at least we would know that we're moving in the
direction which our country wants us to do collectively. So, I'm
proud to be on the team.
THE PRESIDENT: Good, thank you. Is your counterpart on your
REPRESENTATIVE RANGEL: Yes, he is. Dave and I --
THE PRESIDENT: Come on, Dave.
REPRESENTATIVE RANGEL: -- have worked so closely together.
If we can keep disagreements down, we'll be a hell of a team.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, what I meant, Charlie, was let's give him
the mic. (Laughter and applause.)
REPRESENTATIVE CAMP: It's tough in the minority, let me tell
you. (Laughter.) You do lose the microphone when you're not
in the majority.
But thank you, Mr. President. Thank you so much for bringing us
all together. I think much of what has been said I can agree
with. And I think particularly the idea that we have an American
solution, and certainly in America the idea that a patient and a
physician make the health care decisions that affect them is certainly
something we need to protect.
And I just appreciate the opportunity to be here, look forward to
working with you. There's so many things that we talked about
that we had in common, in terms of health information technology,
wellness. But we are going to have to figure out just how much of
our economy is devoted to health care, and that's going to be a big
issue we have to face.
THE PRESIDENT: Right.
REPRESENTATIVE CAMP: And this cost-shifting that goes on between
public and private health care dimensions, and those are challenging
things, but I look forward to working with you and your team on this.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, you raise a couple of important
points. Number one, doctors. And I'm assuming that we've
got somebody -- and I'm going to call on them in a second -- but I've
got a lot of very close friends who are doctors. And the enormous
pressure and strain that the medical profession is now feeling from a
whole variety of sources is something that we've got to attend to in
this reform process. We're not producing enough primary care
physicians, because the costs of medical education are so high that
people feel they've got to specialize.
The issue of malpractice insurance is real, and if you're an OB/GYNE,
that is enormous pressure that you've having to deal with.
One of the things that we've done in this budget that we're presenting
is to finally surface what had been the fiction that we weren't going
to give doctors higher reimbursements -- we always did it in the end;
we just didn't budget for it -- and caused enormous stress for
Now, the flip of it is if we're going to do more for doctors, part of
what we've also got to say is, if there are states like Minnesota that
are providing as good or better care than other states, and yet are
keeping their costs lower, and Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements are
better controlled, shouldn't we be learning from what those states are
doing, and then making that more generally applicable?
And there may be some resistance on the part of providers to say, well,
you know, our circumstances are different in this state or that
state. But this is what I mean when I say that data and evidence
have to drive the process. If we can find better practices, then
doctors have to be willing to learn from the experience of others in
terms of controlling costs. They've got to be part of the
solution, as well.
So since I'm talking about doctors, we've got Ted Epperly of the
American Academy of Family Physicians. Is Ted around here
somewhere? Here we go. Go ahead. You've got a mic
right behind you.
DR. EPPERLY: Well, first, Mr. President, what an honor to be here
and to be with all of you. Speaking on behalf of over 100,000
family doctors, we're ready to do our part. We very much believe
that we need to expand coverage in this country to everyone, and we
need to fix the workforce, sir, so that all those patients have a place
to go. We'll roll up our shirt sleeves and do everything possible
to make this work, because it is the right thing to do, and I applaud
you and this body for doing this today, to do it this year, and we must
do it. Thank you.
THE PRESIDENT: Good. Okay, before we break up, because
we've been using some time, and I'm starting to get Reggie Love
signaling over there -- whenever he stands, since he's 6'5, I see him
-- (laughter) -- and I know that we're running out of time. Are
there some people that I did not call on that have a critical question
or point that they would like to make?
Yes, go ahead, please.
REPRESENTATIVE CAPPS: Thank you very much. I'm Lois Capps,
and I will love to follow the doctor. I also want to say to
Senator Kennedy, this is the time. As one of three nurses in the
U.S. Congress, the proposals you are putting forward resonate.
Nurses do provide quality care. They help reduce costs through
increased preventive care, and they deliver cost-effective primary
care, along with physicians, especially in underserved areas.
But we have a huge shortage of nurses today. And estimates are
that the U.S. will be lacking over 500,000 nurses in the next seven
years. Our nursing schools are only able to admit a tiny fraction
of applicants. The great -- greatest bottleneck for educating
more nurses comes from the lack of nursing school faculty.
You've done a great job by proposing an increase in nursing education
in your 2010 budget and by including nurse education funding in the
Recovery Act. I'd love to hear your thoughts. If not -- if
there's no time today, I'd love to pursue this -- there are other
nurses in the room -- on how we can further advance nursing education
and faculty training, because they are going to be essential to our
overall efforts to contain costs while expanding and improving
care. Thank you very much.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, let me respond to this right away, because
it's not that complicated. Nurses provide extraordinary
care. I mean, they are -- they are the front lines of the health
care system. And they don't get paid very well. Their
working conditions aren't as good as they should be. And when it
comes to nurse faculty, they get paid even worse than active
nurses. So what happens is, is that it is very difficult for a
nurse practitioner to go into teaching, because they're losing money.
The notion that we would have to import nurses makes absolutely no
sense. And for people who get fired up about the immigration
debate and yet don't notice that we could be training nurses right here
in the United States -- and there are a lot of people who would love to
be in that helping profession and yet we just aren't providing the
resources to get them trained -- that's something that we've got to
fix. That should be a no-brainer. That should be a
bipartisan no-brainer to make sure that we've got the best possible
nursing staffs in the country. (Applause.)
Q Thank you, Mr. President. I know you stressed
the cost efficiencies and that is certainly important and it was an
important part of our breakout session. But I also want to
commend you for also being honest in saying that there has to be a new
source of funding, as well, because in your reserve fund you mentioned
a new source of funding dealing with deductions, whatever, for people
over a certain income. And I do notice that there is a tendency
to think that we can somehow expand health insurance and achieve
coverage for everyone just with the existing money in the system, and I
don't think that's true.
So I want to commend you for that, and I want everyone to keep in mind
the fact that we have to come up with a new source of funding, either
what you proposed or perhaps others, because, even as you said in your
budget message, that this only pays, this reserve fund, for about half
the cost if we're going to cover everyone. And that's an
important part of this, as well.
THE PRESIDENT: Let me -- I want to make a important distinction,
though, between short-term costs and long-term costs. I don't
think that we can expand coverage on the front end without some
money. By definition, we will not have changed the system
sufficiently to drive down costs in order to pay for new people being
part of the system.
Now, keep in mind, we're already paying for those folks. Every
single person at home, the average family is paying $900 per family in
additional premiums because of the care that people are receiving in
emergency rooms. So we're paying for it, but it's oftentimes
But capturing those savings will take some time. Health IT is
going to save money -- but it's not going to save money in year one or
year two; it'll save money in year 10, 11, 15 and 20. If we're
doing a good job on prevention and are reducing rates of obesity -- if
we went back to the obesity rates that existed back in 1980, we'd save
the system a trillion dollars, but we're not going to do that overnight
-- it's going to take some time.
So what we constantly have to think about is short-term costs versus
even higher long-term costs. And what I'm trying to do in this
debate is make sure that we're focused not just on year one and year
two, but on year 10, year 20, year 30 and year 50, and making sure that
our children are not bankrupted. Now, that creates a very
difficult political task. Nothing is harder in politics than
doing something now that costs money in order to gain benefits 20 years
from now. It's the single hardest thing to do in politics, and
that's part of the reason why health care reform has consistently
There should be enough money in the system. We spend more per
capita than any nation on Earth. And to find that American
solution that mixes public and private, but also says we shouldn't have
such an inefficient system and we should make investments today to
ensure that we're saving money down the road, that's going to be our
Okay, I've got time for maybe a couple more questions. The
gentleman right here. And I'll catch folks back here, as well.
MR. McANDREWS: Mr. President, my name is Lawrence McAndrews. I
represent the National Association of Children's Hospitals.
First, I'd like to thank you for your leadership with CHIP; extending
coverage to 4 million children is just fantastic. (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.
MR. McANDREWS: Second, as your leadership in CHIP has
illustrated, perhaps children can lead the way. And I think we in
the pediatric community -- children represent 25 percent of the
population, 10 percent of the health care costs -- and we I think are a
small enough community, cohesive enough, the doctors and the hospitals
working together, we know each other, that perhaps we can offer an
opportunity to be another leading edge in your plan for change.
And we would work with you in the implementation of any quality
measures, any new incentive structures.
And I think children's hospitals tend to be a disrupter in the cost of
care, because they take care of 40 to 50 percent of the market and we
can -- and the most expensive kids. Working with you, we can make
the biggest down payment, the Willie Sutton principle, so to speak,
where the money is, we can help you manage that.
THE PRESIDENT: Good.
MR. McANDREWS: Thank you very much.
THE PRESIDENT: That's a great point, that's a great point.
(Applause.) I'm going to make this -- I'm -- oh, suddenly
everybody raises their hand. (Laughter.) I'm going to take
two more questions -- this young lady right here and then this
gentleman right here, just because they had their hands up a little bit
Q Thank you so very much, Mr. President. And
it's quite an honor for you having all of us here today. You've
created a network among us that we didn't even know exists. We
are more alike than we are different. And I would ask that all of
us help to make sure that the elimination of racial and ethnic health
disparities be a core component of whatever health care reform
legislation may look like that you enact.
And I thank you again. (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think that's important, I think that's
important. And that's an example of where there is some data out
there that's pretty indisputable that even when you account for incomes
and levels of insurance, that you're still seeing problems in the
African American community and the Latino community, Native American
communities, in terms of quality of care and outcomes.
And part of what we should be doing is to think about, based on this
evidence and this data, are there ways that we can close those
gaps. And to the extent that that is reflected in this reform, I
think that will ultimately save everybody money. Okay?
Q Thank you so much. Just one really quick one
-- if you will give us the marching orders before we leave.
DR. REDLENER: Mr. President, I'm Irwin Redlener, a pediatrician at
Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health, and President of
the Children's Health Fund. And I also just want to underscore
how extraordinarily important this meeting was. It launches
health care in a way that I don't think we've ever seen before in this
country. And we all, I know, congratulate you deeply about that.
And I wanted to say just a couple of words about prevention, which has
been mentioned a few times. Prevention needs to be bolstered by a
strong American public health system, as well. And we cannot
forget about the public health infrastructure as we're building and
strengthening our health care system in general. So the public
health schools are often the places where the research is done that
tell us and guide us what kinds of preventive interventions actually
work. And what works is really going to be important.
I also wanted to underscore what Larry McAndrews said about the
importance of investing in children. They are not only a
compelling moral issue for us, but they are compelling fiscally, as
well. America is going to be depending on its children to be
fully functional, to function in school, to succeed in ways that can
only happen if their health is protected and guarded.
And the final point is that I don't think we've mentioned yet the role
of individual citizens. Every single American has a role to play
in making us healthier as a nation. And your inspiration and
hopefully the inspiration of others here will make sure that
individuals know that their choices of healthy lifestyle decisions, and
making sure they get the prevention that they need will bolster our
ability to provide quality health care and reduce the cost of care that
could have been avoided if we had thought about prevention in the first
place. Thank you. (Applause.)
THE PRESIDENT: Those are all great points.
Let me just close by saying this -- because somebody asked for marching
orders. Number one, all of the groups here need to stay
involved. And I know you will. Number two, we will generate
a report or a summary of the comments in the various breakout sessions
that will be distributed to all the participants. Number three, I
know that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, and
the other leadership are interested in moving a process forward, and so
unlike the fiscal responsibility summit where I think we have to have
some discussion about mechanisms and how do we make it work so that it
takes, I think here you've got a bunch of committees that are eager and
ready and willing to get to work.
And so I just want to make sure that I don't get in the way of all of
you moving aggressively and rapidly. I've got some very strong
ideas and the White House will be providing some guideposts and
guidelines about what we think we can afford to do, how we think it's
best to do it, but we don't have a monopoly on good ideas. And to
the extent that this work is being done effectively in these various
committees, then I assure you that we are going to do everything that
we can to work with all of you -- Democrat and Republican.
But the one thing that I've got to say here: There's been some
talk about the notion that maybe we're taking on too much; that we're
in the midst of an economic crisis and that the system is overloaded,
and so we should put this off for another day. Well, let's just
be clear. When times were good, we didn't get it done. When
we had mild recessions, we didn't get it done. When we were in
peacetime, we did not get it done. When we were at war, we did
not get it done.
There is always a reason not to do it. And it strikes me that now
is exactly the time for us to deal with this problem. The
American people are looking for solutions. Business is looking
for solutions. And government -- state, federal, and local --
needs solutions to this problem.
So for all of you who've been elected to office or those of you who are
heading up major associations, I would just say, what better time than
now and what better cause for us to take up? Imagine the pride
when we go back to our constituencies next year and say, you know what,
we finally got something done on health care. That's something
that's worth fighting for, and I hope all of you fight for it.
4:55 P.M. EST