| January 20, 2001 |
| Inauguration of Pres. George W. Bush. Between 2002 and 2003, Bush administration migrates White House e-mail from Lotus Notes to Microsoft Exchange. |
 |
|
| February 26, 2001 |
 |
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales informs White House staff they must preserve their e-mail because “[a]ny e-mail relating to official business . . . qualifies as a Presidential record,” even if it is received on a personal e-mail account. |
|
| June 4, 2001 |
Bush announces plan to name a White House Chief Information Officer (CIO) to manage and monitor e-mail. |
| Late 2001 to early 2002 |
White House dismantles the Automated Records Management System (ARMS) put in place by Clinton Administration to archive e-mails.
New archiving system, Electronic Communications Records Management System (ECRMS), is proposed as transition to Microsoft Exchange begins. In the interim, EOP institutes process to manually label and archive each component’s Exchange .pst (Personal Storage Table) files every day—which former CIO Carlos Solari called a “temporary” and “short-term situation” for e-mail preservation. |
| December 2002 - May 2003 |
ECRMS draft plan reviewed and approved by White House Office of Administration (OA) Counsel, White House office of Records Management and White House Counsel. |
| January 3, 2003 |
Start date of period of missing e-mails.
A 2005 OCIO staff report (“2005 Report”) documented e-mail archiving irregularities within all EOP components. The study was performed using two Microsoft Virtual Basic tools, “Findit” and “CMDFI”, and identified a total of 473 days of an approximate 1,000 day period in which one or more EOP components reported zero e-mail. The report also identified 229 days within the same period where one or more components recorded inexplicably low e-mail tallies. |
| September 2003 |
Vendor proposals for ECRMS received, selection process made. Booz Allen Hamilton awarded phase 1 contract for ECRMS. |
| October 2003 (unknown date) |
 |
White House CIO stops "recycling" backup tapes. |
|
| January 6, 2004 |
Meeting between EOP and NARA officials during which “[t]he NARA team emphasized that EOP was operating at risk by not capturing and storing messages outside the email system.” |
| April - May 2004 |
Completed ECRMS solution design is presented to OA Counsel, White House Records Management Office and White House Counsel for review/approval. |
| November 2, 2004 |
Final configuration of EOP File Plan used to archive records completed. |
| January 2005 - October 2005 |
ECRMS System configuration, testing, tuning. |
| July 28, 2005 |
Last day listed in 2005 Report with either zero e-mail (“Red Days"), or suspiciously low e-mail tallies (“Yellow Days”) within the day’s e-mail archive.
Component |
Red Days |
Yellow Days |
White House Office |
12 |
28 |
Office of the Vice Pres. |
16 |
30 |
Office of Public Diplomacy |
11 |
7 |
National Security Council |
47 |
9 |
President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board |
20 |
14 |
Council of Economic Advisors |
103 |
29 |
Council on Environmental Quality |
81 |
5 |
Office of Management and Budget |
59 |
10 |
Office of National Drug Control Policy |
20 |
24 |
Office of Science and Technology Policy |
15 |
39 |
Office of the United States Trade Representative |
73 |
10 |
Office of Administration |
16 |
24 |
TOTAL |
473 |
229 |
|
| October 2005 |
| Office of Administration discovers that some e-mail may not have been archived properly. OA’s detailed analysis later revealed hundreds of days between January 3, 2003, and July 28, 2005, when e-mails were missing for one or more EOP components, totaling approximately 5 million. OA briefs Harriet Miers and Patrick Fitzgerald on the e-mail retention process. |
 |
|
| November 14, 2005 |
Steven McDevitt, then-Director of Architecture and Engineering for the White House Office of the Chief Information Officer sends memo to Acting CIO John Straub, warning that “the current process and lack of storage management limitations result in potential loss of emails. Lost or misplaced email archives in turn result in an inability to meet statutory requirements.” |
| January 23, 2006 |
|
| February 2, 2006 |
NARA officials contact the White House Counsel, reminding them that NARA should be contacted prior to destruction of Presidential records. In a response on February 6, 2006, OA Counsel informs NARA that White House “believed that the emails existed and could be accounted for.” |
| May 2006 |
| Theresa Payton begins tenure as White House CIO. |
 |
|
| August 21, 2006 |
ECRMS ready to go live, pending approval of OA director and CIO Payton.
Payton decides to not implement ECRMS, citing concern over the predicted 18-month “ingestion” of backlogged messages (although the ingestion would have been complete by the end of Pres. Bush’s second term,) and the inability for staff to distinguish records subject to the PRA and FRA from political or personal e-mail (despite the fact that OA Counsel had previously approved this aspect of the ECRMS system.) |
| February 6, 2007 |
NARA staff meet with CIO Payton and OA staff. OA tells NARA that it will not implement ECRMS, “and therefore emails are no longer being preserved in a formal electronic recordkeeping system. . . . OA gives NARA no indication that there is a problem with any missing emails.” |
| April 12, 2007 |
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (“CREW”) releases report based on information from two confidential sources detailing loss of more than 5 million e-mails generated between March 2003 and October 2005. |
| April 13, 2007 |
 |
White House spokesperson Dana Perino comments, "I wouldn't rule out that there were a potential 5 million emails lost." |
|
| April 16, 2007 |
Perino says, "[W]e are aware that there could have been some emails that were not automatically archived because of a technical issue." |
| April 25, 2007 |
White House Counsel meets with “key members of NARA’s senior staff” to brief them on e-mail situation. NARA makes its first of several requests for a copy of the 2005 Report detailing missing/low e-mail days, and urges commencement of restoration program.
|
| May 2, 2007 |
 |
Senator Patrick Leahy subpoenas missing e-mail in US Attorney scandal. |
|
| May 21, 2007 |
NARA representatives met with several senior White House officials for a briefing on the White House e-mail problem. Associate White House Counsel Chris Oprison stated that “they believe the problem relates to gaps in emails on the EOP system from late 2003 to late 2005, but . . . could not assure that the problem does not extend beyond that timeframe, and even into the present.” |
| May 22, 2007 |
CREW files lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act against OA for records about White House e-mail system. |
| May 29, 2007 |
Deputy General Counsel of OA, Keith Roberts, informs staffers in House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Committee that low/missing days in 2005 Report correspond with period when .pst files were manually archived. |
| August 21, 2007 |
OA receives an opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) which “provided legal advice to the White House Counsel’s Office regarding OA’s status under FOIA.” On the same day, OA files a motion in CREW’s FOIA lawsuit arguing that the case should be dismissed because it is not an “agency” subject to FOIA. This argument contradicts OA’s history of responding to FOIA requests, filing of annual FOIA reports, and drafting of a FOIA improvement plan. Soon after, OA takes down the FOIA page on its web site.
OA later claims in litigation with CREW that the OLC memo was “not the final decision” and therefore need not be disclosed. The memo remains secret. |
| September 5, 2007 |
The National Security Archive sues White House defendants and NARA, seeking the recovery and preservation of more than 5 million e-mails under the Federal Records Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.
In an internal NARA memo to Archivist Allen Weinstein, NARA General Counsel Gary Stern states that “we still know virtually nothing about the status of the alleged missing White House emails” and “it is vital that any needed backup restoration project begin as soon as possible, in order that it be completed before the end of the Administration.” |
| September 19, 2007 |
White House briefs Oversight Committee staff, providing access to the 2005 Report with spreadsheet showing more than 700 days with low or no e-mail for at least one EOP component. |
| September 25, 2007 |
CREW files lawsuit nearly identical to that of the National Security Archive, seeking preservation of missing White House e-mails. |
| October 10, 2007 |
Theresa Payton briefs Oversight Committee staff and attempts to cast doubt on reliability of 2005 Report, noting that CIO staffers are unable to replicate report’s findings. |
| October 11, 2007 |
Meeting between NARA officials and White House CIO. White House staff informed NARA that its analysis of missing e-mails had been delayed again and would not be ready for six weeks. NARA warned the White House that they should begin planning for a restoration project, which would be necessary if doubt remained that all messages were preserved. NARA requested again to review the 2005 Report, but it was not made available. |
| October 26, 2007 |
The National Security Archive files a motion seeking expedited discovery against the Executive Office of the President to find out more about missing e-mails. |
| October 31, 2007 |
NARA officials given opportunity to review, although prohibited from copying, the 2005 Report. |
| November 12, 2007 |
Judge Henry Kennedy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia consolidates the two cases separately filed by the National Security Archive and CREW and grants a Temporary Restraining Order, directing EOP to preserve all e-mail backup media in its possession. |
| December 4, 2007 |
White House spokesman Scott Stanzel states, “We are aware that some e-mails may not have been automatically archived in the past, but they may be available on backup tapes. … The Office of Administration at the White House has been maintaining and preserving backup tapes for the official email system.” |
| January 8, 2008 |
Magistrate Judge Facciola orders the White House to answer questions about the missing e-mails, noting that the need for information on the missing e-mails is “time-sensitive” because of the risk that stored copies of the e-mails “are increasingly likely to be deleted or overridden with the passage of time.” |
| January 15, 2008 |
In response to Judge Facciola’s order, the White House, in a declaration by CIO Theresa Payton, refuses to acknowledge any missing e-mails but states that it “has undertaken an independent effort to determine whether there may be anomalies in Exchange e-mail counts” and discloses that it had recycled e-mail back-up tapes before October 2003. |
| January 18, 2008 |
 |
Responding to questions about the missing e-mails, White House spokesman Tony Fratto states: “we have absolutely no reason to believe that any e-mails are missing.” Waxman responds with a letter to White House Counsel Fred Fielding, citing the nearly 500 days with zero e-mails archived identified in the 2005 Report. |
|
| February 14, 2008 |
Telephone briefing with Oversight Committee Staff and Theresa Payton and Emmett Flood.
Payton says CIO is using newer software tool to analyze e-mails/perform search and has recovered about 100 .pst files with names that do not correspond with their contents. |
| February 21, 2008 |
Former EOP IT staffer Steven McDevitt submits response to Oversight Committee’s interrogatories, revealing that he had identified and informed EOP officials about serious risks with post-ARMS e-mail archiving as early as 2003. |
| February 22, 2008 |
Telephone briefing with Oversight Committee Staff and Theresa Payton and Emmett Flood reports that 23 million previously uncounted e-mails were discovered.
Staff has “found” e-mail for at least some of the days that 2005 Report indicates had no e-mails preserved. Payton could not specifically quantify how many were found for these days. Some e-mails found for “all of the missing days for the White House Office, the Office of Policy Development, and the Office of Management and Budget. Similarly, some e-mails had been found for 5 of 16 missing days for the Office of the Vice President.” Findings described as “preliminary” and Payton cautions that analysis will not be complete until “sometime in March.” |
| February 26, 2008 |
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on White House E-mail situation. |
| March 6, 2008 |
CREW files Show Cause Motion, seeking contempt/sanctions against Payton in response to apparent contradictions between the Feb. 26 Oversight Comm. Hearing and January 15 declaration. |
| March 11, 2008 |
National Security Archive files Emergency Motion to Extend TRO/Preservation Order and seek depositions. |
| March 14, 2008 |
Government files oppositions to the Archive’s Emergency Motion to Extend TRO/Preservation Order and CREW’s Motion for Contempt and Sanctions. |
| March 18, 2008 |
Magistrate Judge Facciola orders EOP to show cause why it should not be required to make forensic copies of all computer hard drives and other storage media in White House system, including costs and burden of the copying process. |
| March 21, 2008 |
Government files opposition to “Forensic Copy” order, accompanied by a second declaration of Theresa Payton. Declaration reveals (1) most computers from contested period have been replaced or--if still in service--would be difficult to track down; (2) White House standard procedure included wiping out or destroying information on hard drives prior to decommissioning them or re-issuing them to new staff. |
| March 25, 2008 |
National Security Archive files response to “Forensic Copy” order. |
| April 24, 2008 |
Magistrate Judge Facciola orders EOP to supplement its March 21 response with more precise information about the costs of forensic copying to preserve e-mails, and recommends that the court order EOP to remotely copy and preserve e-mails from workstations and to collect and preserve all portable media held by EOP employees that may contain e-mails. |
| May 5, 2008 |
The White House files a response to Magistrate Judge Facciola’s April 24, 2008 First Report and Recommendation and Third Declaration of CIO Theresa Payton, admitting that it has no computer back-up tapes with data written before May 23, 2003 and that it cannot track the history of individual hard drives within the White House system that may contain missing e-mails. |
| May 8, 2008 |
The Archive files a response to the April 24, 2008 Report and Recommendation, objecting in part to Judge Facciola’s denial of court-supervised depositions and reiterating concerns about whether missing e-mails are in fact preserved on back-up tapes held by the White House. |