Table of Contents
Author Index
Contact Us
Review BoardAuthor Instructions
Related Research
Subscription Info
SearchJHClinkJournal Home

2175 K St., NW, Suite 810
School of Public Health
and Health Services
The George Washington University
Washington, DC 20037


Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives

ABSTRACTS

Volume 9, Number 6
November–December 2004


Vol. 9, Number 6: Contents | Editorial | Abstracts


Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisements on Network Television: An Exploration of Quantity, Frequency, and Placement
    Erica Brownfield A1, Jay Bernhardt A1, Jennifer Phan A1, Mark Williams A1, Ruth Parker A1

A1 Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Prescription and over-the-counter(OTC)drug advertisements that appear on television are among the most common forms of health communication reaching the U.S. public, but no studies to date have explored the quantity, frequency, or placement of these ads on television. We explored these questions by recording all programs and advertisements that appeared on network television in a southeastern city during a selected week in the summer of 2001 and coding each prescription and OTC drug ad for its frequency, length, and placement by time of day and television program genre. A total of 18,906 ads appeared in the 504-hour sample, including 907 OTC drug ads(4.8%)and 428 prescription(Rx)drug ads(2.3%), which together occupied about 8%of all commercial airtime. Although OTC drug ads were more common, Rx drug ads on average were significantly longer. Direct-to-consumer drug ads appeared most frequently during news programs and soap operas and during the middle-afternoon and early-evening hours. Overall, we found that direct-to-consumer drug advertisements occupy a large percentage of network television commercial advertising and, based on time and program placement, many ads may be targeted specifically at women and older viewers. Our findings suggest that Americans who watch average amounts of television may be exposed to more than 30 hours of direct-to-consumer drug advertisements each year, far surpassing their exposure to other forms of health communication.

Direct-to-Consumer Advertising and its Utility in Health Care Decision Making: A Consumer Perspective
    Aparna Deshpande A1, Ajit Menon A1, Matthew Perri III A1, George Zinkhan A2

A1 Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
A2 Department of Marketing and Distribution, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

The growth in direct-to-consumer advertising(DTCA)over the past two decades has facilitated the communication of prescription drug information directly to consumers. Data from a 1999 national survey are employed to determine the factors influencing consumers' opinions of the utility of DTC ads for health care decision making. We also analyze whether consumers use DTC ad information in health care decision making and who are the key drivers of such information utilization. The study results suggest that consumers have positive opinions of DTCA utility, varying across demographics and perceptions of certain advertisement features. Specifically, consumers value information about both risks and benefits, but the perception of risk information is more important in shaping opinions of ad utility than the perception of benefit information. Consumers still perceive, however that the quality of benefit information in DTC ads is better than that of risk information. Opinions about ad utility significantly influence whether information from DTC ads is used in health care decision making.

A Content Analysis of Direct-to-Consumer Television Prescription Drug Advertisements
     Kimberly Kaphingst A1, William DeJong A2, Rima Rudd A3, Lawren Daltroy A4

A1 Department of Society, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A2 Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A3 Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A4 Department of Society, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A5 Department of Society, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
A6 RBB Arthritis Research Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

This article reports the results of a content analysis of 23 direct-to-consumer(DTC)product-specific television prescription drug advertisements broadcast during 2001. A majority of ads used both medical and lay terms to convey medical ideas. Most gave consumers somewhat more time to absorb facts about benefits than those about risks, which could have implications for the“fair balance”requirement. Complete references to additional product information were given only in text, casting doubt on whether these ads are making“adequate provision”for dissemination of detailed product information. Overall, our results call into question the potential of these ads to educate consumers.

Is the Information “Fair and Balanced” in Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites?
    Jisu Huh A1 and Brenda Cude A2

A1 School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
A2 College of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA

This study applies the Food and Drug Administration's(FDA's)“fair-balance disclosure”provision to examine the content of prescription drug websites, specifically focusing on the quantity and quality of risk information. The results show that even though most prescription drug websites provide both risk and benefit information, the two types of information are presented differently. This study suggests directions for regulators to consider in writing a more specific rule to ensure that information on prescription drug websites is balanced.

Evaluating Direct-to-Consumer Marketing of Race-Based Pharmacogenomics: A Focus Group Study of Public Understandings of Applied Genomic Medication
     Benjamin Bates A1, Kristan Poirot A2, Tina Harris A3, Celeste Condit A3, Paul Achter A4

A1 Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, USA
A2 University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
A3 University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
A4 University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USA

Some medical providers have advocated applied genomics, including the use of genetically linked racial phenotypes in medical practice, raising fear that race-based medication will become justified. As with other emerging medical genetic technologies, pharmaceutical companies may advertise these treatments. Researchers fear that consumers will uncritically accept pharmaceutical messages and demand the product. In this exploratory study, we examined public reactions to advertisements for applied genomic medications. A focus group methodology was employed. Participants tended to resist the message and generated warrants for doing so, indicating critical reception of the messages. Message accepters also provided warrants. Warrants for resistance and acceptance differ between self-identified racial groups. Consumers, health care providers, and pharmaceutical corporations will benefit from a better understanding of direct-to-consumer advertisements as medical communication. Our study concludes that both advocates and opponents of direct-to-consumer advertisements should recognize that potential consumers of pharmacogenomics act as critical consumers of health advertising discourse.

DTC Advertising for Prescription Medicines: Research and Reflections as the Second Decade Ends
     Ken Rabin A1

A1 Ruder Finn, Inc., United Kingdom

This article does not have an abstract.

DTC Advertising
     Robert Baukus A1

A1 Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA

This article does not have an abstract.

Acknowledgment

This article does not have an abstract.